Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+internal\s+error\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+internal\s+error\s*$/: 59 ]

Total 59 documents matching your query.

1. RE: XFS internal error (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:58:06 -0400; Sorry for top posting on this reply, but I was wondering if there was any resolution to your problem below. We seem to be running into a similar problem. A few hours before the error in this thread o; /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00384.html (10,427 bytes)
2. Re: XFS internal error (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:37:41 +0200; I think that might have been an issue on our FS as well. No, no resolution, no debugging advice, etc .. We've basically had to ignore it - and it didn't surface a lot more, now you mention it. We ar; /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00398.html (10,739 bytes)
3. RE: XFS internal error (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:58:06 -0400; Sorry for top posting on this reply, but I was wondering if there was any resolution to your problem below. We seem to be running into a similar problem. A few hours before the error in this thread o; /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00832.html (10,427 bytes)
4. Re: XFS internal error (score: 1): Author: xxxx>; Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:37:41 +0200; I think that might have been an issue on our FS as well. No, no resolution, no debugging advice, etc .. We've basically had to ignore it - and it didn't surface a lot more, now you mention it. We ar; /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00846.html (10,739 bytes)
5. Re: XFS internal error (score: 1): Author: Andreas Kotes <count-linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:22:16 +0100; * David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> [20080310 13:18]: I seem to be having similiar problems, and xfs_repair is not helping :( I always run into: [ 137.099267] Filesystem "sda2": XFS internal error xfs_tra; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00103.html (9,815 bytes)
6. Re: XFS internal error (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:30:18 +1100; xfs_repair is ensuring that the problem is not being caused by on-disk corruption. In this case, it does not appear to be caused by on-disk corruption, so xfs_repair won't help. Interesting. I think; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00109.html (10,768 bytes)
7. Re: XFS internal error (score: 1): Author: Andreas Kotes <count@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:59:27 +0100; Hello Dave, * David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> [20080310 23:30]: ok, too bad - btw, is it a problem that I'm doing the xfs_repair on a mounted filesystem with xfs_repair -f -L after a remount rw? certainl; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00110.html (12,133 bytes)
8. Re: XFS internal error (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:45:40 +1100; If it was read only, and you rebooted immediately afterwards, you'd probably be ok. Doing this to a mounted, rw filesystem is asking for trouble. If the shutdown is occurring after you've run xfs_rep; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00111.html (10,089 bytes)
9. Re: XFS internal error (score: 1): Author: Andreas Kotes <count-linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:47:46 +0100; * David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> [20080311 00:45]: whoops, that should have read 'remount ro' .. xfs_repair on a live and writable filesystem is of course inviting desaster. I was trying read only - bt; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00127.html (11,195 bytes)
10. Re: XFS internal error (score: 1): Author: Andreas Kotes <count-linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:50:50 +0100; * Andreas Kotes <count-linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> [20080311 14:47]: ok, I cannot find the differences, but I have five machines showing similiar symptoms: = a6b = [1924291.170115] Filesystem "sda2": XFS int; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00137.html (15,035 bytes)
11. Re: XFS internal error (score: 1): Author: David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:01:21 +1100; Do you do this on every boot? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00139.html (9,056 bytes)
12. Re: XFS internal error (score: 1): Author: Andreas Kotes <count@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:17:44 +0100; * Andreas Kotes <count@xxxxxxxxxxx> [20080313 08:14]: oh, btw - running xfs_check doesn't work most of the time, as the log usually contains entries, and isn't replayed before shutdown .. I figure r; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00141.html (10,169 bytes)
13. Re: XFS internal error (score: 1): Author: Andreas Kotes <count@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 08:14:45 +0100; Hallo Dave, * David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> [20080313 01:01]: no, I did this on a6b and a7b so far, where the problems I mentioned occur, and only after I saw these in-memory problems. in general, XFS; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00142.html (9,462 bytes)
14. dflush hang on xlog_grant_log_space() (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:22:16 +0100; 'resblks=45' is the value returned by: resblks = XFS_MKDIR_SPACE_RES(mp, dir_namelen); and this is the value when the error_return label i; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00492.html (9,815 bytes)
15. line 1150 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c (score: 1): Author: c@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:30:18 +1100; d idea. Just don't do it, and wait a few hours for the initial sync to happen. The speed above is indeed terrible. Perhaps the array is re; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00498.html (10,768 bytes)
16. fs/xfs_trans.c (score: 1): Author: c@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 23:59:27 +0100; space in it. so it's definitely not a directory namespace creation issue. So with 256 byte inodes, we need a 16k allocation or a 4 block ex; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00499.html (12,133 bytes)
17. internal error (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:45:40 +1100; by on-disk corruption. In this case, it does not appear to be caused by on-disk corruption, so xfs_repair won't help. Interesting. I think; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00500.html (10,089 bytes)
18. line 1150 of file fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxx; Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:47:46 +0100; ing file(s) were checked into: longdrop.melbourne.sgi.com:/isms/linux/2.6.x-xfs-melb Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:30641a fs/xfs/xfsidbg.; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00516.html (11,195 bytes)
19. nt UUID code (score: 1): Author: c@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:50:50 +0100; evel filesystem. If we really wanted it it would go into the VFS, storing the uuid or other identifier for the mountpoint in an xattr. Thi; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00526.html (15,035 bytes)
20. 202 blocked for more than 120 seconds (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 11:01:21 +1100; ok, I cannot find the differences, but I have five machines showing similiar symptoms: = a6b = [1924291.170115] Filesystem "sda2": XFS int; /archives/xfs/2008-03/msg00528.html (9,056 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]