Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+for\s+new\s+update\s+redhat\s+kernel\s+2\.4\.18\-17\.8\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. XFS for new update redhat kernel 2.4.18-17.8 (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 10:21:41 +0200
t as a bug for XFS though? Did I misunderstand? -- Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Coremetrics, Inc. Attachment: signature.asc Description: This is
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00430.html (7,796 bytes)

2. Re: XFS for new update redhat kernel 2.4.18-17.8 (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 19:18:33 +1000
plied cleanly, but kdb does not work or rather does not compile.. There are a redhat kernel with xfs at http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/2.5/.
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00432.html (8,364 bytes)

3. Re: XFS for new update redhat kernel 2.4.18-17.8 (score: 1)
Author: x
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 17:17:23 +0100
lesystem block sizes. However, that restriction is now gone, and block sizes < page size also are supported. So, originally, mkfs.xfs would mak
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00437.html (8,634 bytes)

4. Re: XFS for new update redhat kernel 2.4.18-17.8 (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:40:49 +0200
r/ag0/tmp4323 could not pre-a
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00457.html (8,539 bytes)

5. by LABEL does not work on whole disks. (score: 1)
Author: n Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 10:21:41 +0200
t had the time to look at it yet, it's in bugzilla, we're aware of it... feel free to add to the bug if you get more info. -Eric
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01209.html (7,796 bytes)

6. BEL does not work on whole disks. (score: 1)
Author: n Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 19:18:33 +1000
x changed: What |Removed |Added -- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID This bug needs to be sent to Andries (the util-linux maintai
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01211.html (8,364 bytes)

7. XFS for new update redhat kernel 2.4.18-17.8 (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 17:17:23 +0100
either not patch or fail to compile over RH patches. kdb only tracks standard Marcelo/Linus kernels, not distributors
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01216.html (8,634 bytes)

8. realtime mount fix (score: 1)
Author: is Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:40:49 +0200
e mo
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01236.html (8,539 bytes)

9. XFS for new update redhat kernel 2.4.18-17.8 (score: 1)
Author: Knut J Bjuland <knutjbj@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 10:21:41 +0200
I applied the patch from 2.4.18-14XFS and they applied cleanly, but kdb does not work or rather does not compile.. There are a redhat kernel with xfs at http://people.redhat.com/arjanv/2.5/.
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01988.html (7,840 bytes)

10. Re: XFS for new update redhat kernel 2.4.18-17.8 (score: 1)
Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 19:18:33 +1000
RedHat apply patches in the same area that kdb does, it is not unusual for kdb to either not patch or fail to compile over RH patches. kdb only tracks standard Marcelo/Linus kernels, not distributors
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01990.html (8,388 bytes)

11. Re: XFS for new update redhat kernel 2.4.18-17.8 (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 17:17:23 +0100
I'll try to get it fixed next week.
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01995.html (8,771 bytes)

12. Re: XFS for new update redhat kernel 2.4.18-17.8 (score: 1)
Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 14:40:49 +0200
Knut J Bjuland schrieb: Since the RPMs were still useful without kdb, are there any chances you make them available somewhere? Simon
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02015.html (8,608 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu