Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+file\s+locking\s+questions\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. removing files (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:46:28 -0500
were ISO images). Why do XFS waste such time for deleting that files? Note: It happends to me a lot of times... Process: I make, re
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00581.html (6,721 bytes)

2. emoving files (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxx>
Date: 24 Oct 2002 17:49:00 -0500
te the iso. If your file is really fragmented then it might well take a while. If you are running the 1.1 release or earlier then yo
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00582.html (7,820 bytes)

3. IO. (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:17:51 -0700
f it is in the vfs code, all the filesystem gets to be involved in is maintaining the fact that mandatory locks are present on the inode. I think. Now you
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00584.html (7,469 bytes)

4. serfs-list] Re: [ext3-users] To compare Linux journalised filesystem, part II. (score: 1)
Author: n Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:46:28 -0500
or freed space. So while we do not have data journalling, quota updates are journalled. Steve -- Steve Lord
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01360.html (6,721 bytes)

5. ] To compare Linux journalised filesystem, part II. (score: 1)
Author: A Goodwin" <jagoodwi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 24 Oct 2002 17:49:00 -0500
o many changes in one workarea.... Missing bit of xfs_panic_mask The following file(s) were checked into: b
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01361.html (7,820 bytes)

6. - Missing bit of xfs_panic_mask (score: 1)
Author: d <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:17:51 -0700
o XFS waste such time for deleting that files? Note: It happends to me a lot of times... Process: I make, re
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01363.html (7,469 bytes)

7. XFS file locking questions (score: 1)
Author: "James A Goodwin" <jagoodwi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 17:46:28 -0500
What types of file locking are supported by XFS (if any)? In particular, does it support range locking? Regards, -James Goodwin Software Engineer IBM Global Services - Federal jagoodwi@xxxxxxxxxx Pho
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02139.html (6,721 bytes)

8. Re: XFS file locking questions (score: 1)
Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>
Date: 24 Oct 2002 17:49:00 -0500
File locking should all work, in linux 99% of it is in the vfs code, all the filesystem gets to be involved in is maintaining the fact that mandatory locks are present on the inode. I think. Now you
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02140.html (7,914 bytes)

9. Re: XFS file locking questions (score: 1)
Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:17:51 -0700
Pretty much all locking is done on the VFS above the filesystem. Locking methods should therefore work with all filesystems in pretty much the same way. --cw
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02142.html (7,563 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu