- 1. s (score: 1)
- Author: @xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:51:31 +0930
- ition, you might as well use the original RH installer, create just /boot, the swap and a small root partition (say, 1GB or depending on your system needs
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00619.html (7,366 bytes)
- 2. ence cache (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:23:38 -0500 (CDT)
- S is _always_ faster when dealing with large files (create, write, read, delete). It might be slightly slower with lots of small files, but not with a few
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00620.html (8,945 bytes)
- 3. Re: [PATCH] page_buf stuff (score: 1)
- Author: bert <clambert@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Oct 2002 11:14:27 -0800
- tic, a conditional expression which I have to deduce is defaulting to the left hand side in the case where there is no right hand side. In general callers of the block layer
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00683.html (7,805 bytes)
- 4. cancel (score: 1)
- Author: ndeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:39:19 +0100
- nd basically the only kernel patch I added was supermount+ O(1) batch scheduler and -aa vm patch. Now the problem seems to be different. If a process writes large files (abo
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00685.html (7,809 bytes)
- 5. ion to mount (score: 1)
- Author: Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Oct 2002 14:10:44 -0600
- to the kernel or as a module? What does /proc/filesystems say? --cw
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00692.html (8,057 bytes)
- 6. Re: Recent dissections (score: 1)
- Author: x>
- Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:51:31 +0930
- trying to repair...which is an Arena Indy 2400. It gets all the way to phase 5 then a message flashes on the screen of the raid
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01398.html (7,366 bytes)
- 7. About removing files (score: 1)
- Author: avid Lloyd <lloy0076@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:23:38 -0500 (CDT)
- are we talking about here? Sparse files are fragmented almost by defintion ... sparse files have holes in them ... and having ho
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01399.html (8,945 bytes)
- 8. fix 2.4-xfs pagebuf request (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 29 Oct 2002 11:14:27 -0800
- c.orig Tue Oct 29 01:48:57 2002 +++ linux/fs/xfs/pagebuf/page_buf.c Tue Oct 29 01:52:17 2002 @@ -1665,22 +1665,18 @@ bh = bufferlist[i]; /* Complete
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01462.html (7,805 bytes)
- 9. (score: 1)
- Author: <florin@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:39:19 +0100
- Additional Comments From lord@xxxxxxx 2002-10-29 04:57 -- The use of make_bad_inode in xfs is going to have to be removed somehow, basically what is
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01464.html (7,809 bytes)
- 10. fs + preempt causes hangs? (score: 1)
- Author: <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Oct 2002 14:10:44 -0600
- ng bugs with the patch-set-du-jour can be rough. If you can't repr
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01471.html (8,057 bytes)
- 11. XFS Logs on Another Device (score: 1)
- Author: David Lloyd <lloy0076@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 10:51:31 +0930
- I can't quite work out how to get XFS to put the logs on another device or volume. A few questions: 1) How does one setup the other device? - does it need a separate partition - or...? 2) What would
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02177.html (7,396 bytes)
- 12. Re: XFS Logs on Another Device (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 21:23:38 -0500 (CDT)
- Yes, the external log needs it's own partition, on any disk. I suppose a whole disk might work, but that would be a horrible waste of space. :) Well, from the man page.... ;-) The metadata log can be
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02178.html (9,015 bytes)
- 13. Re: XFS Logs on Another Device (score: 1)
- Author: Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Oct 2002 11:14:27 -0800
- I guess it depends on how crazy you are for performance. ;-) -- Florin Andrei Many would-be screenwriters seem to have the impression that they can write a script based only on an idea. This is simil
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02241.html (7,901 bytes)
- 14. Re: XFS Logs on Another Device (score: 1)
- Author: Bernhard Erdmann <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:39:19 +0100
- Yes, the external log needs it's own partition, on any disk. I suppose a whole disk might work, but that would be a horrible waste of space. :) LVM is very cool for things like this. Just define a 8-
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02243.html (7,918 bytes)
- 15. Re: XFS Logs on Another Device (score: 1)
- Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Oct 2002 14:10:44 -0600
- Unless you're using Qlogic fibre cards!!!(qla2300 seems to be the problem child) Austin
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02250.html (8,105 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu