Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+1\.2Pre\s+and\s+nfs\s+problem\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. XFS 1.2Pre and nfs problem (score: 1)
Author: Þeref Tufan Þen <tufan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:44:32 +0300
e
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00235.html (11,383 bytes)

2. Re: XFS 1.2Pre and nfs problem (score: 1)
Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 11 Oct 2002 11:11:52 -0500
are two aspects of the same operation. The following file(s) were checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: 2.
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00241.html (13,730 bytes)

3. Re: XFS 1.2Pre and nfs problem (score: 1)
Author: Þeref Tufan Þen <tufan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 14:03:49 +0300
nt pages. As I understand it, these pages should be free for use. Looking at the zone_t structures for the only pg_data_t structure
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00264.html (8,714 bytes)

4. Re: XFS 1.2Pre and nfs problem (score: 1)
Author: Þeref Tufan Þen <tufan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:54:30 +0300
ople on linux-poweredge@xxxxxxxx that see interrupt only handled by the first processor. I could get this on a pe2550 that shared interru
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00318.html (10,014 bytes)

5. Re: XFS 1.2Pre and nfs problem (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: 16 Oct 2002 09:46:58 -0500
Oct 15
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00332.html (11,058 bytes)

6. Re: XFS 1.2Pre and nfs problem (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 07:33:16 +1000
ty easy to do, and without breaking backward compatibilty (since older implementations would simply ignore the bits). he just doesn't re
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00345.html (8,923 bytes)

7. Re: XFS 1.2Pre and nfs problem (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:13:37 +0300
warnings you see with or without the patch you added to the bug? Are the warnin
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00381.html (8,891 bytes)

8. e bits bug comeback? (score: 1)
Author: <I.D.Hardy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:44:32 +0300
spinning a RedHat installer, and also that fast! Good news: + The supplied kernel sources seem to work very well. + The installer does work when installing a minimal system. H
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01014.html (11,383 bytes)

9. d (score: 1)
Author: <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 11 Oct 2002 11:11:52 -0500
tant_p is doing its stuff this should turn into __fswab64 which will execute this code: __u32 h = x >> 32
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01020.html (13,730 bytes)

10. .2a1] root xfs filesystem executable bits bug comeback? (score: 1)
Author: werkenbijdeotto1@xxxxxx
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 14:03:49 +0300
Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda6 xfs 3.6G 909M 2.7G 25% / [root@tarpon tmp]# uname -r 2.4.18
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01043.html (8,714 bytes)

11. k_page()) (score: 1)
Author: combernous@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:54:30 +0300
en md is set up with 3 (odd #) devices, then a mount sleeps indefinitely on down(), and when md is set up with 4
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01097.html (10,014 bytes)

12. r on m68k in 2.5.43 (score: 1)
Author: llwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 16 Oct 2002 09:46:58 -0500
rigraphs -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -fno-strength-reduc
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01111.html (11,058 bytes)

13. Re: Request for known XFS bugs.] (score: 1)
Author: >
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 07:33:16 +1000
which described a very similar configuration to the above. The symptoms described above seem to be an interactio
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01124.html (8,923 bytes)

14. when compiling kernel (score: 1)
Author: Mike Gigante <mg@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 10:13:37 +0300
ed a whole disk with xfs and ext2, and neither could mount by label. -Eric
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01160.html (8,891 bytes)

15. XFS 1.2Pre and nfs problem (score: 1)
Author: Þeref Tufan Þen <tufan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 12:44:32 +0300
I have a nfs server running XFS. I have problems with 2.4.19+xfs 1.2pre kernels. Nfsd processes are getting stuck at state D. I have kdb and got a back trace of one the stuck nfsd processes. System :
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01793.html (11,383 bytes)

16. Re: XFS 1.2Pre and nfs problem (score: 1)
Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 11 Oct 2002 11:11:52 -0500
So couple quick things first if you could submit a bug report via bugzilla. http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/ We have decided to give a bug tracking system a try. Hopefully this will help with tracking an
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01799.html (13,823 bytes)

17. Re: XFS 1.2Pre and nfs problem (score: 1)
Author: Þeref Tufan Þen <tufan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 14:03:49 +0300
Done... http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=178 No idea. Students home directories are accessible through the nfs server.. Ligth load actually. -- eref Tufan en TÜ-BDB Sistem Destek Grubu
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01822.html (8,843 bytes)

18. Re: XFS 1.2Pre and nfs problem (score: 1)
Author: Þeref Tufan Þen <tufan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 11:54:30 +0300
Hi,,, I still have problems with nfs. I decided to run xfs_repair on my filesystems. On one of my fs xfs_repairs ends with the following error. I'm using XFS 1.2pre kernel and utilities.. The second
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01876.html (10,186 bytes)

19. Re: XFS 1.2Pre and nfs problem (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: 16 Oct 2002 09:46:58 -0500
Did this generate any errors in your system logs? -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. 651-683-3102
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01890.html (11,292 bytes)

20. Re: XFS 1.2Pre and nfs problem (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 07:33:16 +1000
990 (EFSCORRUPTED) can be generated by xfs_repair itself (via libxfs). Its not supposed to happen, but it can. :( Running ltrace on xfs_repair would help to find the offending routine in libxfs. chee
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01903.html (9,172 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu