Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*XFS\s+\(CVS\s+release\)\s+problem\:\s+mkfs\.xfs\s+failed\s+on\s+hppa\s*$/: 21 ]

Total 21 documents matching your query.

1. 却是真实的故事 月收入数 (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:09:53 +0200
218.22.32.12/index.asp ϻô꣬ҴӲ׬һǮģҾЩ˵׬ǮƭЩġһżȻĻ
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00548.html (8,446 bytes)

2. p://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/cmd_rpms/ unmaintained? (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:07:35 +0100
v
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00553.html (9,016 bytes)

3. (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:37:33 +0200
s possible that I am incorrect. However, my understanding is that yes, you do need data-journaled quota files to ensure that your quota tables don't miss
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00568.html (18,552 bytes)

4. stions (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:54:59 +1000
ty much all locking is done on the VFS above the filesystem. Locking methods should therefore work with all filesystems in pretty much the same way. --cw
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00586.html (9,421 bytes)

5. : xfs locking -- stack dump (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:10:56 +0200
frame. You will get a different I/O p
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00599.html (8,794 bytes)

6. S release) problem: mkfs.xfs failed on hppa (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:08:45 -0500 (CDT)
s was the right place. ANy way I prety sure that I found a small bug at this place. Here is my full patch: -- cmd/xfsprogs/libxfs/init.c.orig 2002-10-25 12:12:29.000000000 +0200 +++ cmd
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00601.html (9,906 bytes)

7. tion of in-memory data detected" (score: 1)
Author: @xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:57:32 +0200
m is somewhat repeatable, there are a couple things we can try to get more information. Although, if it's in production, maybe that's not possible? -Eric
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00602.html (9,307 bytes)

8. ] xfs_force_shutdown on a lvm device (score: 1)
Author: grs385@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:09:53 +0200
allers for quite a while now and I need to redo a server (that gets quite a bit of load) and I HATE EXT3.
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01327.html (8,446 bytes)

9. Ȱǰ, Ư-(ΰ~) (score: 1)
Author: stoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:07:35 +0100
ernel (20021022) diff versus 2.4.19 vanilla kernel, apply it against 2.4.19-pa22 (with very small problem) and obtain a bootable (and operational) kernel. Now I rebuild debian
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01332.html (9,016 bytes)

10. tem, part II. (score: 1)
Author: xxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:37:33 +0200
1a linux/fs/xfs/pagebuf/page_buf.c - 1.72
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01347.html (18,552 bytes)

11. options and Direct IO. (score: 1)
Author: xxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:54:59 +1000
re supported by XFS (if any)? In particular, does it support range locking? Regards, -James Goodwin Software Engineer IBM Global Services - Federal jagoodwi@xxxxxxxxxx Pho
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01365.html (9,421 bytes)

12. omers (score: 1)
Author: Luben Tuikov <luben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:10:56 +0200
on another m
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01378.html (8,794 bytes)

13. data detected" (score: 1)
Author: xx
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:08:45 -0500 (CDT)
__down+82/d0> Trace; c0107fec <__down_faile
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01380.html (9,906 bytes)

14. stack dump (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 16:57:32 +0200
stack frame. You will get a different I/O p
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01381.html (9,307 bytes)

15. XFS (CVS release) problem: mkfs.xfs failed on hppa (score: 1)
Author: jsoe0708@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 08:09:53 +0200
Hi all, I build a xfs-kernel (20021022) diff versus 2.4.19 vanilla kernel, apply it against 2.4.19-pa22 (with very small problem) and obtain a bootable (and operational) kernel. Now I rebuild debian
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02106.html (8,446 bytes)

16. Re: XFS (CVS release) problem: mkfs.xfs failed on hppa (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 12:07:35 +0100
Can you send me the strace output for strace mkfs.xfs /dev/sda12?
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02111.html (9,108 bytes)

17. Re: XFS (CVS release) problem: mkfs.xfs failed on hppa (score: 1)
Author: jsoe0708@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 19:37:33 +0200
Hi Christoph, Here you are: execve("/sbin/mkfs.xfs", ["mkfs.xfs", "/dev/sda12"], [/* 15 vars */]) = 0 newuname({sys="Linux", node="palinux", ...}) = 0 brk(0) = 0x60000 mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02126.html (18,581 bytes)

18. Re: XFS (CVS release) problem: mkfs.xfs failed on hppa (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 11:54:59 +1000
Looks like mkfs.xfs is trying to write past the end of the device. Possibly the BLKGETSIZE64 ioctl has been mishandled by the device driver? 2199023190016 is a fairly large byte offset. This ioctl is
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02144.html (9,498 bytes)

19. Re: XFS (CVS release) problem: mkfs.xfs failed on hppa (score: 1)
Author: jsoe0708@xxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 15:10:56 +0200
Hi Nathan, This was the right place. ANy way I prety sure that I found a small bug at this place. Here is my full patch: -- cmd/xfsprogs/libxfs/init.c.orig 2002-10-25 12:12:29.000000000 +0200 +++ cmd
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02157.html (8,850 bytes)

20. Re: XFS (CVS release) problem: mkfs.xfs failed on hppa (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 09:08:45 -0500 (CDT)
Hi, thanks for looking into it. I originally handled the error as I did because per the ioctl man page, RETURN VALUE Usually, on success zero is returned. A few ioctls use the return value as an outp
/archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02159.html (9,930 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by Namazu