Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Work\s+Items\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Work\s+Items\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. Work Items (score: 1): Author: Alp ATICI <atici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 18:19:14 -0400 (EDT); om xfs_repair: Phase 1 -find and verify superblock... superblock read failed, offset 0,size 524288, ag 0,rval 0 i.e. it's not sayin; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00260.html (7,442 bytes)
2. Re: Work Items (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 13:56:41 +0100; ATTN: AWARD NOTIFICATION; FINAL NOTICE We are pleased to inform you of the announcement today, 12TH OCTOBER. 2002, of winners of the; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00265.html (8,378 bytes)
3. Re: Work Items (score: 1): Author: Alp ATICI <atici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 11:36:15 -0400 (EDT); nfs server.. Ligth load actually. -- Şeref Tufan Şen İTÜ-BİDB Sistem Destek Gru; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00267.html (8,268 bytes)
4. Re: Work Items (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 13:44:41 -0500 (CDT); oot XFS-partitions (Eric, sorry for my bad wording about "root-mounted" partitions in the previous mail). It is also difficult to trigge; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00268.html (9,264 bytes)
5. Re: Work Items (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 21:33:51 +0200; nally, XFS can handle 64-bit inodes and 64-bit block numbers. However, since Linux VFS cannot handle 64-bit inodes, XFS on Linux is -always- restricted to 32 bit inodes. see the unconditional "a; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00270.html (8,789 bytes)
6. Re: Work Items (score: 1): Author: Stephen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 12 Oct 2002 15:42:33 -0500; v3 wouldn't work. You can use custom iget functions to look them up in the inode cache. What doesn't work is exporting them to user spac; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00272.html (9,315 bytes)
7. Re: Work Items (score: 1): Author: Andi Kleen <ak@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 23:57:27 +0200; files with a + on the permissions, which is erroneous. you can see the acls with the following: getfattr -m . file you will see a system; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00273.html (8,936 bytes)
8. Re: Work Items (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 13:29:34 +0100; ich recently(er, today) failed. This was a good 40GB of data on a 70GB logical drive, and it's all striped, which usually means it's all; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00278.html (8,435 bytes)
9. re[2]: Work Items (score: 1): Author: Greg Freemyer <freemyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:11:13 -0400; ed as module. make modules_install ends up in: depmod: ** Unresolved symbols in /lib/modules/2.4.20-pre10aa1/kernel/fs/xfs/xfs.o depmod:; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00296.html (7,832 bytes)
10. root xfs filesystem executable bits bug comeback? (score: 1): Author: Straz <nstraz@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 18:19:14 -0400 (EDT); is. Steve -- Steve Lord voice: +1-651-683-3511 Principal Engineer, Filesystem Software email: lord@xxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01039.html (7,442 bytes)
11. table bits bug comeback? (score: 1): Author: �en <tufan@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 13:56:41 +0100; ng time. Now that 2.5.42 addressed 2 TB limit, would XFS have 64 bit inodes (as it normally has AFAIK on IR; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01044.html (8,378 bytes)
12. ges (score: 1): Author: mm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 11:36:15 -0400 (EDT); psing was an lvcreate, but lvcreate doesn't use mmap as; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01046.html (8,268 bytes)
13. ICATION (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 13:44:41 -0500 (CDT); the zone_t structures for the only pg_data_t structure; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01047.html (9,264 bytes)
14. and nfs problem (score: 1): Author: don <jhaydon@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 21:33:51 +0200; ries are accessible through the nfs server.. Ligth load actually. -- Şeref Tufan Şen İTÜ-BİDB Sistem Destek Gru; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01049.html (8,789 bytes)
15. bug comeback?) (score: 1): Author: n <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 12 Oct 2002 15:42:33 -0500; .theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-xfs&m=100740237824601&w=2 (TAKE - restrict xfs inodes to 32 bits) http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-xfs&m=99928901910853&w=2 (TAKE - mkfs; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01051.html (9,315 bytes)
16. (score: 1): Author: hen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 23:57:27 +0200; it inodes and 64-bit block numbers. However, since Linux VFS cannot handle 64-bit inodes, XFS on Linux is -always- restricted to 32 bit inodes. see the unconditional "a; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01052.html (8,936 bytes)
17. Work Items (score: 1): Author: homeless3d@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2002 13:29:34 +0100; urrent i386 kernel zeroes the upper 32bits because internally on 32bit systems ino_t is only defined as long (=3; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01057.html (8,435 bytes)
18. ssible bug with xfsdump, -e and -l 1 (score: 1): Author: eve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2002 12:11:13 -0400; de/asm-i386/byteorder.h - 1.3 - Better cod; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01075.html (7,832 bytes)
19. Work Items (score: 1): Author: Alp ATICI <atici@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2002 18:19:14 -0400 (EDT); Hi , I was checking out the "work items" under SGI XFS site, and it hasn't been updated for a long time. Now that 2.5.42 addressed 2 TB limit, would XFS have 64 bit inodes (as it normally has AFAIK o; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01818.html (7,442 bytes)
20. Re: Work Items (score: 1): Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2002 13:56:41 +0100; XFS does have 64bit inodes, Linux VFS doesn't. Yes.; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01823.html (8,515 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]