Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Russell\'s\s+patch\s+against\s+RH\s+7\.1\s+\.\.\.\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Russell's patch against RH 7.1 ... (score: 1)

Author: Alan Eldridge <alane@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 00:44:32 -0400

The patch I'm using is one he did last night. It's for RH Rawhide 2.4.5-0.2.9 kernel. It's on ftp.thebarn.com in /SGI/testing. -- Alan Eldridge "I've told you once." "No you haven't."

/archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00246.html (9,207 bytes)

2. Re: Russell's patch against RH 7.1 ... (score: 1)

Author: "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 21:59:47 -0400

*DUMB* question: What is the "RHlinux-*" file for? I looked through the files and it seems to be a subset of the other. -- TheBS -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx chat:thebs413 SmithConcept

/archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00276.html (8,989 bytes)

3. Re: Russell's patch against RH 7.1 ... (score: 1)

Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 12:26:25 +1000

linux-2.4.5-xfs-06082001.patch contains the new XFS files, RHlinux-2.4.5-core-xfs-06082001.patch contains XFS changes to the core kernel. BTW Russell, linux-2.4.5-xfs-06082001.patch contains lots of

/archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00277.html (8,403 bytes)

4. Re: Russell's patch against RH 7.1 ... (score: 1)

Author: "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 23:31:31 -0400

??? I cannot get the latter to patch against RH 2.4.5-0.2.9. Maybe I should just stick with the CVS tree? I see it is now upto 2.4.6pre2. -- TheBS P.S. Damn it, I ordered my Athlon 1.3GHz chip Monday

/archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00280.html (8,857 bytes)

5. Re: Russell's patch against RH 7.1 ... (score: 1)

Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 02:07:18 -0500

Oops sorry about that forgot to do a mrproper first I'll have a better set of patches once I'm sure the merge actually runs. -- Russell Cattelan cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx

/archives/xfs/2001-06/msg00287.html (8,771 bytes)

6. Russell's patch against RH 7.1 ... (score: 1)

Author: Alan Eldridge <alane@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001 00:44:32 -0400

The patch I'm using is one he did last night. It's for RH Rawhide 2.4.5-0.2.9 kernel. It's on ftp.thebarn.com in /SGI/testing. -- Alan Eldridge "I've told you once." "No you haven't."

/archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01416.html (9,207 bytes)

7. Re: Russell's patch against RH 7.1 ... (score: 1)

Author: "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 21:59:47 -0400

*DUMB* question: What is the "RHlinux-*" file for? I looked through the files and it seems to be a subset of the other. -- TheBS -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx chat:thebs413 SmithConcept

/archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01446.html (8,989 bytes)

8. Re: Russell's patch against RH 7.1 ... (score: 1)

Author: Keith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 12:26:25 +1000

linux-2.4.5-xfs-06082001.patch contains the new XFS files, RHlinux-2.4.5-core-xfs-06082001.patch contains XFS changes to the core kernel. BTW Russell, linux-2.4.5-xfs-06082001.patch contains lots of

/archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01447.html (8,403 bytes)

9. Re: Russell's patch against RH 7.1 ... (score: 1)

Author: "Bryan J. Smith" <b.j.smith@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2001 23:31:31 -0400

??? I cannot get the latter to patch against RH 2.4.5-0.2.9. Maybe I should just stick with the CVS tree? I see it is now upto 2.4.6pre2. -- TheBS P.S. Damn it, I ordered my Athlon 1.3GHz chip Monday

/archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01450.html (8,857 bytes)

10. Re: Russell's patch against RH 7.1 ... (score: 1)

Author: Russell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001 02:07:18 -0500

Oops sorry about that forgot to do a mrproper first I'll have a better set of patches once I'm sure the merge actually runs. -- Russell Cattelan cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx

/archives/xfs/2001-06/msg01457.html (8,771 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]