Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RedHat\s+8\.0\s+and\s+XFS\,\s+the\s+sad\s+story\s+continues\s+\.\.\.\s+$was\:\s+Begging\s+\:\^$\)\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*RedHat\s+8\.0\s+and\s+XFS\,\s+the\s+sad\s+story\s+continues\s+\.\.\.\s+$was\:\s+Begging\s+\:\^$\)\s*$/: 27 ]

Total 27 documents matching your query.

1. Re: RedHat 8.0 and XFS, the sad story continues ... (was: Begging :^)) (score: 1): Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 16:14:48 +0200; Axel Thimm schrieb: The problem is that whenever RedHat creates an errata kernel, it has to be rebuilt with XFS support. I'm sure they _will_ finally include XFS, at least the way they did it with Re; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00016.html (11,081 bytes)
2. RedHat 8.0 and XFS, the sad story continues ... (was: Begging :^)) (score: 1): Author: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:56:55 +0200; a linux/arch/i3; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00057.html (10,652 bytes)
3. Re: RedHat 8.0 and XFS, the sad story continues ... (was: Begging :^)) (score: 1): Author: Theo Van Dinter <felicity@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:59:19 -0400; S installers/an; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00058.html (11,052 bytes)
4. Re: RedHat 8.0 and XFS, the sad story continues ... (was: Begging :^)) (score: 1): Author: Ragnar Kjørstad <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:07:18 +0200; your System.map; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00061.html (11,048 bytes)
5. Re: RedHat 8.0 and XFS, the sad story continues ... (was: Begging :^)) (score: 1): Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 03 Oct 2002 12:48:10 -0500; ustin@xxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00067.html (11,136 bytes)
6. Re: RedHat 8.0 and XFS, the sad story continues ... (was: Begging :^)) (score: 1): Author: Ragnar Kjørstad <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:55:59 +0200; remetrics, Inc.; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00068.html (10,734 bytes)
7. Re: RedHat 8.0 and XFS, the sad story continues ... (was: Begging :^)) (score: 1): Author: Bill Anderson <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 03 Oct 2002 12:21:29 -0600; 0.patch Descrip; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00071.html (10,548 bytes)
8. Re: RedHat 8.0 and XFS, the sad story continues ... (was: Begging :^)) (score: 1): Author: Stuart Luppescu <s-luppescu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 04 Oct 2002 08:47:37 -0500; ere. Unfortunat; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00100.html (11,534 bytes)
9. Re: RedHat 8.0 and XFS, the sad story continues ... (was: Begging :^)) (score: 1): Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 04 Oct 2002 11:30:22 -0500; chanism to deal; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00109.html (10,037 bytes)
10. ^) (score: 1): Author: gruendler@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 16:14:48 +0200; , I'm currently trying to get AIO and XFS (from Andrea's tree, 2.4.20pre8aa1) to work together. At the moment, AIO works fine on my ext3/2 filesystems, but it breaks on XFS. (This is from doing; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00795.html (11,081 bytes)
11. ts (score: 1): Author: eve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:56:55 +0200; nance of count of delayed write pagebufs, this is an internal counter for diagnostic purposes. The following file(s) were checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: 2.4.; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00836.html (10,652 bytes)
12. d linux (score: 1): Author: mm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 12:59:19 -0400; xfs filesystem on an lvm volume on an i386 ide disk. xfsdump seems to happily work: date=`date +%y-%m-%d` xfsdump -l 0 -p 30 -L home.full.$date -M home.full.$date - /home I wanted to save t; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00837.html (11,052 bytes)
13. ntinues ... (was: Begging :^)) (score: 1): Author: Straz <nstraz@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:07:18 +0200; really... There is more than one way to upgrade your installation. I personally copy all of the RPMs into a single directory, remove the ones I know I don't want to install (I have a person; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00840.html (11,048 bytes)
14. Begging :^)) (score: 1): Author: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 03 Oct 2002 12:48:10 -0500; check. My goal is to hit 2.4.20 as the primary production kernel when it's ready, but I'm looking for a production -AA patch, which I think I'll have to use split patches, from AA, so long; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00846.html (11,136 bytes)
15. 2.4.19-aa1 (score: 1): Author: austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:55:59 +0200; a production -AA patch, which I think I'll have to use split patches, from AA, so long; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00847.html (10,734 bytes)
16. XFS, the sad story continues ... (was: Begging :^)) (score: 1): Author: hen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 03 Oct 2002 12:21:29 -0600; an. I won't stop you. :-) But you may have to fiddle a little; e.g. you probably don't want to upgrade _everything_ at once (because then your server will be unavailable for a long time), s; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00850.html (10,548 bytes)
17. : mount hangs (score: 1): Author: hen Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: 04 Oct 2002 08:47:37 -0500; the whole thing at: http://software.cfht.hawaii.edu/xfs_repair.strace.gz Memory usage actually jumped to almost 800 MB right away and stayed there for a while. Then it went back under 10 M; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00879.html (11,534 bytes)
18. Re: unable to use xfs_repair (score: 1): Author: lbrink <mimi.ka@xxxxxx>; Date: 04 Oct 2002 11:30:22 -0500; t? Craig --; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00888.html (10,037 bytes)
19. Re: RedHat 8.0 and XFS, the sad story continues ... (was: Begging :^)) (score: 1): Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2002 16:14:48 +0200; Axel Thimm schrieb: The problem is that whenever RedHat creates an errata kernel, it has to be rebuilt with XFS support. I'm sure they _will_ finally include XFS, at least the way they did it with Re; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01574.html (11,184 bytes)
20. RedHat 8.0 and XFS, the sad story continues ... (was: Begging :^)) (score: 1): Author: Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2002 15:56:55 +0200; This is ugly. People will be banging SGI's doors for a RedHat installer again, and I could very well understand, that they wouldn't want to go through that again and drop supporting XFS installers/an; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01615.html (10,805 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]