- 1. em: mkfs.xfs failed on hppa (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:54:42 -0400
- today. The symptoms it was exhibiting were that disk access stopped causing load-average to climb. It came back after a reboot and seems to be running fine
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00605.html (8,186 bytes)
- 2. re is the results of my last question... (score: 1)
- Author: @xxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Oct 2002 14:17:02 -0500
- ils about removing files. I have experienced that using one downloader assistant (that creates a big sparse file an then fill it to complete download), I
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00610.html (10,222 bytes)
- 3. release) problem: mkfs.xfs failed on hppa (score: 1)
- Author: enberger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:54:42 -0400
- , there are a couple things we can try to get more information. Although, if it's in production, maybe that's not possible? -Eric
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01384.html (8,186 bytes)
- 4. se) problem: mkfs.xfs failed on hppa (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 25 Oct 2002 14:17:02 -0500
- lvm on top of raid5 on top of some scsi disks to work. Here are some recent curiosities which for now seem to reconcile mount-
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01389.html (10,222 bytes)
- 5. Recent dissections (score: 1)
- Author: Luben Tuikov <luben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 12:54:42 -0400
- As the folks on linux-xfs know, I've recently tried to get xfs on top of lvm on top of raid5 on top of some scsi disks to work. Here are some recent curiosities which for now seem to reconcile mount-
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02163.html (8,186 bytes)
- 6. Re: Recent dissections (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Oct 2002 14:17:02 -0500
- We do special handling of LVM and md in xfs_super.c:xfs_alloc_buftarg(), (and page_buf.c:_pagebuf_page_io()) using only sector-sized buffer heads for pagebufs in the LVM case, and only aligned I/O in
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02168.html (10,287 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu