Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Question\s+about\s+kernel\s+update\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Question\s+about\s+kernel\s+update\s*$/: 55 ]

Total 55 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Question about kernel update (score: 1): Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 08:36:45 +0100; "Joe St.Clair" schrieb: Although this could work for you, it's not the way to go. The kernel should build on whatever the 'original' RedHat kernel was built. Otherwise you may always break something.; /archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00001.html (10,217 bytes)
2. Re: Question about kernel update (score: 1): Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 08:43:20 +0100; Eric Sandeen schrieb: I'm just trying to rebuild the i686 kernel on RH 7.2. It is updated to the latest erata, which is gcc-2.96-108.7.2 and gcc3-3.0.4-1 I'll let you know where it dies. BTW, if some; /archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00002.html (11,804 bytes)
3. Re: Question about kernel update (score: 1): Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 10:50:41 +0100; Simon Matter schrieb: Here we go: -- Enable gcov support (CONFIG_GCOV) [N/y/?] * * Library routines * ** End of Linux kernel configuration. ** Check the top-level Makefile for additional configuratio; /archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00003.html (15,256 bytes)
4. Re: Question about kernel update (score: 1): Author: "Joe St.Clair" <ksimach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 07:11:22 -0500; Eric, I have both the SGI_XFS 17.7.x kernal and the 17.7.x Kernel for RedHat 7.1. When I check for dependencies of the RedHat kernel all seem ok. When I check for dependencies on the SGI built kernel; /archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00004.html (11,053 bytes)
5. Re: Question about kernel update (score: 1): Author: Matthijs van der Klip <matthijs.van.der.klip@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 13:29:31 +0100 (CET); What about these lines in kernel-2.4.18-17SGI_XFS_1.2pre2.spec?: Patch10041: linux-2.4.19-umlfix.patch Also I like to mention I have been able to build a i686 up and smp 17SGI_XFS_1.2pre2 kernel (set; /archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00005.html (8,530 bytes)
6. Re: Question about kernel update (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 08:22:15 -0600 (CST); Hi Joe - Yes, gcc >= 2.96-98 is explicitly listed as a requirement for building the kernel SRPM, what confuses me is that this gcc version does not seem to be available for Red Hat 7.1. Yes, that sho; /archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00006.html (8,650 bytes)
7. Re: Question about kernel update (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 01 Nov 2002 13:55:35 -0600; I guess that I don't know what to say about these problems... we just don't have the bandwidth to build & test RPMs for multiple platforms. In addition to vanilla kernels, we support the latest Red H; /archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00011.html (17,700 bytes)
8. + preempt causes hangs?] (score: 1): Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 11:37:04 +0100; Okay, I have now successfully built 2.4.18-17SGI_XFS_1.2pre2 rpms on RedHat 7.2 and they seems to work as expected. I did remove uml support by changeing the .spec file like this: %define buildUML 0; /archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00038.html (19,154 bytes)
9. !) (score: 1): Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 08:36:45 +0100; er; /archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00454.html (10,217 bytes)
10. ble to mount XFS partition (score: 1): Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 08:43:20 +0100; g.; /archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00455.html (11,804 bytes)
11. S trouble (!) (score: 1): Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 10:50:41 +0100; me; /archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00456.html (15,256 bytes)
12. db v2.4-2.4.19-{common,i386}-2 (score: 1): Author: "Joe St.Clair" <ksimach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2002 07:11:22 -0500; io; /archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00457.html (11,053 bytes)
13. : Question about kernel update (score: 1): Author: Matthijs van der Klip <matthijs.van.der.klip@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 13:29:31 +0100 (CET); el; /archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00458.html (8,530 bytes)
14. : Question about kernel update (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 08:22:15 -0600 (CST); et; /archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00459.html (8,650 bytes)
15. de C610 (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 01 Nov 2002 13:55:35 -0600; an; /archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00464.html (17,700 bytes)
16. ge after shutdown (score: 1): Author: Simon Matter <simon.matter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2002 11:37:04 +0100; am; /archives/xfs/2002-11/msg00491.html (19,154 bytes)
17. Can anyone give me some diagnosis? (score: 1): Author: öfer" <dashofer@xxxxxxx; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 14:46:38 -0500; can do to my 2.4.19-aa1, to just update the XFS code, so our codebase for our kernels can just be version; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00725.html (8,913 bytes)
18. Can anyone give me some diagnosis? (score: 1): Author: ksimach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 21:00:50 +0100; e <html> <head> <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Language" content=3D"pt"> <meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" conte; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00728.html (8,770 bytes)
19. Question about kernel update (score: 1): Author: ndeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:00:57 -0500; dep; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00731.html (9,980 bytes)
20. - Remove remnants of readonly-mount handling (score: 1): Author: ksimach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 30 Oct 2002 16:00:45 -0600; nly-mount handling We were turning the VFS_RDONLY flag back on in xfs_qm_init_quotainos but that's no longer necessary, it's no longer turned off on ro mounts, except for reco; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00732.html (9,352 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]