Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*QoS\s+_put\,\s+_get\s+and\s+

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*QoS\s+_put\,\s+_get\s+and\s+_delete\s+class\s+ops\s+semantic\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. QoS _put, _get and _delete class ops semantic (score: 1): Author: Martin Devera <devik@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 13:43:59 +0200 (CEST); Hi Jamal, please can you help me with this ? During testing of speed improved HTB (as we talked about) I have problem to understand rationale behing Subj and can't find any docs. put and get seem to; /archives/netdev/2002-04/msg00021.html (9,877 bytes)
2. Re: QoS _put, _get and _delete class ops semantic (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 08:35:22 -0400 (EDT); Hi Martin, nod actually sequence would be get();delete();put() whenever "tc class del" is invoked (theres other activity that may happen here as well instead of delete(), example attaching filters to; /archives/netdev/2002-04/msg00039.html (10,364 bytes)
3. Re: QoS _put, _get and _delete class ops semantic (score: 1): Author: Martin Devera <devik@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:41:30 +0200 (CEST); probably he could step in here ;) So that if I understand it correctly: delete can only assure that class is "invisible" from now to subsequent gets/walks and other uses and leave actual destroy to; /archives/netdev/2002-04/msg00044.html (10,058 bytes)
4. Re: QoS _put, _get and _delete class ops semantic (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:42:56 -0400 (EDT); sort of. If you look at the ATM scheduler, you should see the refcount maybe incremented twice. In this case, delete will fail to destroy the class but put() will catch it. If you only increment/decr; /archives/netdev/2002-04/msg00045.html (9,708 bytes)
5. QoS _put, _get and _delete class ops semantic (score: 1): Author: Martin Devera <devik@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2002 13:43:59 +0200 (CEST); Hi Jamal, please can you help me with this ? During testing of speed improved HTB (as we talked about) I have problem to understand rationale behing Subj and can't find any docs. put and get seem to; /archives/netdev/2002-04/msg00124.html (9,925 bytes)
6. Re: QoS _put, _get and _delete class ops semantic (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 08:35:22 -0400 (EDT); Hi Martin, nod actually sequence would be get();delete();put() whenever "tc class del" is invoked (theres other activity that may happen here as well instead of delete(), example attaching filters to; /archives/netdev/2002-04/msg00142.html (10,413 bytes)
7. Re: QoS _put, _get and _delete class ops semantic (score: 1): Author: Martin Devera <devik@xxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:41:30 +0200 (CEST); probably he could step in here ;) So that if I understand it correctly: delete can only assure that class is "invisible" from now to subsequent gets/walks and other uses and leave actual destroy to; /archives/netdev/2002-04/msg00147.html (10,106 bytes)
8. Re: QoS _put, _get and _delete class ops semantic (score: 1): Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 10:42:56 -0400 (EDT); sort of. If you look at the ATM scheduler, you should see the refcount maybe incremented twice. In this case, delete will fail to destroy the class but put() will catch it. If you only increment/decr; /archives/netdev/2002-04/msg00148.html (9,757 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]