Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Practical\s+file\s+system\s+size\s+question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Practical\s+file\s+system\s+size\s+question\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Practical file system size question (score: 1): Author: Robert Bennett <rbennett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:18:00 -0400; We have been running our Storage on XFS for over three years now and are extremely happy. We are running each file system on LSI Hardware Raid with 3 RAID groups of 12+2 with 3 Hot Spares, and 8 fil; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00381.html (7,859 bytes)
2. Re: Practical file system size question (score: 1): Author: Joe Landman <joe.landman@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 09:53:29 -0400; [...] The question is - does anyone have experience with this type of configuration and in particular with 3TB HDDs and a file system size of 99TB? The rebuild time with 2TB drives is ~ 24 hours. Sho; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00383.html (10,354 bytes)
3. Re: Practical file system size question (score: 1): Author: Rafa Griman <rafagriman@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 16:02:15 +0200; Hi :) When you say "LSI Hardware Raid", I assume it's some sort of NetApp/Engenio storage array (aka E2600, E2400, E5500). Am I correct? If so, you should try the new their new feature Dynamic Disk P; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00384.html (9,934 bytes)
4. Re: Practical file system size question (score: 1): Author: Robert Bennett <rbennett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 10:28:06 -0400; Thanks for the quick replies. It's very nice. We are using LSI MegaRAID 9280-8E cards. I got bit by the LSI firmware bug a while back and chased what appeared to be a memory issue before discoverin; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00386.html (14,083 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]