Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Linux\s+SW\s+RAID\:\s+HW\s+Raid\s+Controller\/JBOD\s+vs\.\s+Multiple\s+PCI\-e\s+Cards\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Linux SW RAID: HW Raid Controller/JBOD vs. Multiple PCI-e Cards? (score: 1)

Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 12:33:49 -0400 (EDT)

I currently have a 965 chipset-based motherboard, use 4 port onboard and several PCI-e x1 controller cards for a raid 5 of 10 raptor drives. I get pretty decent speeds: user@host$ time dd if=/dev/ze

/archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00051.html (8,833 bytes)

2. Re: Linux SW RAID: HW Raid Controller/JBOD vs. Multiple PCI-e Cards? (score: 1)

Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 13:54:56 -0700

What does "vmstat 1" output look like in both cases? My guess is that for large writes it's NOT CPU bound but it can't hurt to check. RAID is quirky. It's worth fiddling with the stripe size as that

/archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00055.html (9,706 bytes)

3. Re: Linux SW RAID: HW Raid Controller/JBOD vs. Multiple PCI-e Cards? (score: 1)

Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 23:18:45 +0200

Le Sat, 5 May 2007 12:33:49 -0400 (EDT) vous écriviez: I don't use this setup in production, but I tried it with 8 ports 3Ware cards. I didn't try the latest 9650 though. 3Ghz Supermicro P4D 1 GB R

/archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00059.html (14,923 bytes)

4. Re: Linux SW RAID: HW Raid Controller/JBOD vs. Multiple PCI-e Cards? (score: 1)

Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 17:32:47 -0400 (EDT)

On Sat, 5 May 2007, Emmanuel Florac wrote: Le Sat, 5 May 2007 12:33:49 -0400 (EDT) vous écriviez: However, if I want to upgrade to more than 12 disks, I am out of PCI-e slots, so I was wondering, d

/archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00061.html (16,137 bytes)

5. Linux SW RAID: HW Raid Controller/JBOD vs. Multiple PCI-e Cards? (score: 1)

Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 12:33:49 -0400 (EDT)

I currently have a 965 chipset-based motherboard, use 4 port onboard and several PCI-e x1 controller cards for a raid 5 of 10 raptor drives. I get pretty decent speeds: user@host$ time dd if=/dev/ze

/archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00386.html (8,833 bytes)

6. Re: Linux SW RAID: HW Raid Controller/JBOD vs. Multiple PCI-e Cards? (score: 1)

Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 13:54:56 -0700

What does "vmstat 1" output look like in both cases? My guess is that for large writes it's NOT CPU bound but it can't hurt to check. RAID is quirky. It's worth fiddling with the stripe size as that

/archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00390.html (9,706 bytes)

7. Re: Linux SW RAID: HW Raid Controller/JBOD vs. Multiple PCI-e Cards? (score: 1)

Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 23:18:45 +0200

Le Sat, 5 May 2007 12:33:49 -0400 (EDT) vous écriviez: I don't use this setup in production, but I tried it with 8 ports 3Ware cards. I didn't try the latest 9650 though. 3Ghz Supermicro P4D 1 GB R

/archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00394.html (14,923 bytes)

8. Re: Linux SW RAID: HW Raid Controller/JBOD vs. Multiple PCI-e Cards? (score: 1)

Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 17:32:47 -0400 (EDT)

On Sat, 5 May 2007, Emmanuel Florac wrote: Le Sat, 5 May 2007 12:33:49 -0400 (EDT) vous écriviez: However, if I want to upgrade to more than 12 disks, I am out of PCI-e slots, so I was wondering, d

/archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00396.html (16,137 bytes)

9. Linux SW RAID: HW Raid Controller/JBOD vs. Multiple PCI-e Cards? (score: 1)

Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 12:33:49 -0400 (EDT)

Question, I currently have a 965 chipset-based motherboard, use 4 port onboard and several PCI-e x1 controller cards for a raid 5 of 10 raptor drives. I get pretty decent speeds: user@host$ time dd i

/archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00721.html (8,870 bytes)

10. Re: Linux SW RAID: HW Raid Controller/JBOD vs. Multiple PCI-e Cards? (score: 1)

Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 13:54:56 -0700

What does "vmstat 1" output look like in both cases? My guess is that for large writes it's NOT CPU bound but it can't hurt to check. RAID is quirky. It's worth fiddling with the stripe size as that

/archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00725.html (9,788 bytes)

11. Re: Linux SW RAID: HW Raid Controller/JBOD vs. Multiple PCI-e Cards? (score: 1)

Author: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 23:18:45 +0200

Le Sat, 5 May 2007 12:33:49 -0400 (EDT) vous écriviez: I don't use this setup in production, but I tried it with 8 ports 3Ware cards. I didn't try the latest 9650 though. 3Ghz Supermicro P4D 1 GB RAM

/archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00729.html (15,005 bytes)

12. Re: Linux SW RAID: HW Raid Controller/JBOD vs. Multiple PCI-e Cards? (score: 1)

Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 5 May 2007 17:32:47 -0400 (EDT)

Le Sat, 5 May 2007 12:33:49 -0400 (EDT) vous écriviez: However, if I want to upgrade to more than 12 disks, I am out of PCI-e slots, so I was wondering, does anyone on this list run a 16 port Areca

/archives/xfs/2007-05/msg00731.html (15,922 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]