Results:
References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LLTX\s+fix\s+proposal\s*$/: 8 ]
Total 8 documents matching your query.
- 1. r. (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:18:54 -0800
- s end with default qdisc. I think no
- /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01378.html (8,259 bytes)
- 2. rc1? (score: 1)
- Author: Dunlap" <rddunlap@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jan 2005 22:33:43 -0500
- amazing how many bugs exist due to the local defragmentation and refragmentation done by netfilter. :-) Good catch Patrick, I'll apply this and push upstream.
- /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01382.html (8,022 bytes)
- 3. s390: network driver. (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: 30 Jan 2005 22:38:00 -0500
- pretty sane.. Tested? cheers, jamal
- /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01383.html (8,402 bytes)
- 4. td going mad (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:09:34 -0800
- :53:22.630560952 -0800 @@ -1868,7 +18
- /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01393.html (7,868 bytes)
- 5. LLTX fix proposal (score: 1)
- Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:18:54 -0800
- Ok, how about we do this for 2.6.11 before it goes out and do something more sophisticated (if necessary) later. The BUG() we're trying to catch in the ->hard_start_xmit() routines is the illegal sta
- /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02868.html (8,259 bytes)
- 6. Re: LLTX fix proposal (score: 1)
- Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jan 2005 22:33:43 -0500
- In the e1000 theres a lot more code in hard_start_xmit() that could be possibly entered before you hit the xmit lock. So thats another potential issue. The tg3 you refer to in your email doesnt seem
- /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02872.html (8,096 bytes)
- 7. Re: LLTX fix proposal (score: 1)
- Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jan 2005 22:38:00 -0500
- meant is not _the fix_ too many typos - off to bed. cheers, jamal
- /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02873.html (8,505 bytes)
- 8. Re: LLTX fix proposal (score: 1)
- Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:09:34 -0800
- It could be "_the fix_", I just don't know yet if we'll be deeply satisfied with it in the end. That's all.
- /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02883.html (8,004 bytes)
Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by
Namazu