Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Kernel\s+2\.6\.9\s+Multiple\s+Page\s+Allocation\s+Failures\s*$/: 36 ]

Total 36 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:56:10 -0800
hm, OK, interesting. It's quite possible that XFS is performing rather too many GFP_ATOMIC allocations and is depleting the page reserves. Although increasing /proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes should help
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00004.html (11,451 bytes)

2. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 00:18:37 +0100
Btw, how the min_free_kbytes works? I have up to 1MB TCP windows. If I'm running out of memory then kswapd should try to free some memory (or bdflush). But on GE I can receive data faster then disk i
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00005.html (10,516 bytes)

3. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 16:18:39 -0800
The page reclaim code and the page allocator will aim to keep that amount of memory free for emergency, IRQ and atomic allocations. yes, there's some latency involved. Especially on uniprocessor - if
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00006.html (11,087 bytes)

4. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:18:35 +1100
Hi there, (i.e. zero? so future-proofing for if GFP_ATOMIC != __GFP_HIGH?) OK, I took a quick look through - there's two places where we use GFP_ATOMIC at the moment. One is a log debug/tracing chunk
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00007.html (12,181 bytes)

5. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 23:06:20 -0800
yup. (GFP_ATOMIC & ~ __GFP_HIGH) would mean "allocate atomically, but if this means use emergency pools, then don't bother with that". Just two callsites? That's less that I imagined. Looks like my t
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00008.html (11,064 bytes)

6. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:35:45 +0000
There's only a single place in XFS (and a second one for debug builds) doing GFP_ATOMIC allocations.
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00009.html (11,001 bytes)

7. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:11:30 +0100
Hmm, increasing the min free kb to 64MB and renicing kswapd to -8 seems to solve the issue. However, for me it seems as not so good solution mainly because 2.6.6-bk4 kernel is just ok without any twe
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00010.html (10,524 bytes)

8. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:17:52 +0100
Forgot one more think. Renicing kswapd resulted in xfsbufd oops at reboot. (Regarding preeption) -- Lukáš Hejtmánek
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00011.html (10,749 bytes)

9. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2004 12:17:36 +0100
s
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00020.html (11,927 bytes)

10. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: Nick Piggin <piggin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 09:52:42 +1100
FS
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00024.html (11,003 bytes)

11. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 11:15:18 +1100
F
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00026.html (10,694 bytes)

12. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2004 01:36:51 +0100
te
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00027.html (10,322 bytes)

13. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: xx
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:56:10 -0800
_b
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00104.html (11,451 bytes)

14. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 00:18:37 +0100
lp
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00105.html (10,516 bytes)

15. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 16:18:39 -0800
i
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00106.html (11,087 bytes)

16. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 17:18:35 +1100
if
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00107.html (12,181 bytes)

17. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 23:06:20 -0800
nk
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00108.html (11,064 bytes)

18. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 10:35:45 +0000
t
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00109.html (11,001 bytes)

19. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:11:30 +0100
s.
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00110.html (10,524 bytes)

20. Re: Kernel 2.6.9 Multiple Page Allocation Failures (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 13:17:52 +0100
we
/archives/xfs/2004-12/msg00111.html (10,749 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]

This search system is powered by Namazu