Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*HELP\!\!\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*HELP\!\!\!\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. HELP!!! (score: 1): Author: Knuth Posern <posern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 02:47:36 +0200 (CEST); I have (or had?!) a sotware RAID-5 with the following /etc/raidtab raiddev /dev/md0 raid-level 5 nr-raid-disks 4 nr-spare-disks 0 persistent-superblock 1 chunk-size 128 device /dev/hde1 raid-disk 0; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00519.html (31,169 bytes)
2. Re: HELP!!! (score: 1): Author: Matteo Centonza <matteo@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:54:02 +0200 (CEST); Hi Knuth, It seems that, when hde1 trashed, the raid was still in degraded mode (operational with 3 disks, without hdk1) so can't continue further. RAID5 protects against 1 disk failure (and unfortun; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00527.html (23,383 bytes)
3. Re: HELP!!! (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:05:21 +0200; I have (or had?!) a sotware RAID-5 with the following /etc/raidtab Short answer: You had. I built the raid half a year ago. Formatted it with XFS (and a 2.4.5er kernel). At the moment I use 2.4.10-xf; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00528.html (18,218 bytes)
4. Re: HELP!!! (score: 1): Author: Posern <Posern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:07:13 +0200 (CEST); First thanks for your answers so far! Yippie... And I know, that I did the rest in forcing the mkraid command! But just for the future - cause I still like RAIDs - only this IBM harddisc modell "DTL; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00536.html (18,623 bytes)
5. Re: HELP!!! (score: 1): Author: Joshua Penix <jpenix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:01:17 -0700; These drives are known to be quite unreliable. See here for further links and discussion: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/10/04/0050238&mode=thread Even better would be to have some sort of log; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00548.html (9,642 bytes)
6. Re: HELP!!! (score: 1): Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 20:43:24 +0200; You learned the hard way: RAID is no backup. Good, safe, fast? DLT, AIT, LTO If your data is not worth the money? Be prepared to lose it.; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg00550.html (7,578 bytes)
7. HELP!!! (score: 1): Author: Knuth Posern <posern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 02:47:36 +0200 (CEST); d; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01599.html (31,169 bytes)
8. Re: HELP!!! (score: 1): Author: Matteo Centonza <matteo@xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 10:54:02 +0200 (CEST); m; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01607.html (23,383 bytes)
9. Re: HELP!!! (score: 1): Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:05:21 +0200; n; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01608.html (18,218 bytes)
10. Re: HELP!!! (score: 1): Author: Posern <Posern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 14:07:13 +0200 (CEST); P; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01616.html (18,623 bytes)
11. Re: HELP!!! (score: 1): Author: Joshua Penix <jpenix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 11:01:17 -0700; w; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01628.html (9,642 bytes)
12. Re: HELP!!! (score: 1): Author: "Bernhard R. Erdmann" <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 20:43:24 +0200; .; /archives/xfs/2001-10/msg01630.html (7,578 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]