Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Distribution\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Distribution\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Distribution (score: 1): Author: Chris Tooley <ctooley@xxxxxxxx>; Date: 01 Oct 2002 11:49:02 -0500; Now that XFS has got "official" support of the kernel gods, is there anyone leaning on RedHat to get it in their distribution. I don't really want the XFS team to have to have the additional task (no; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00005.html (6,662 bytes)
2. Re: Distribution (score: 1): Author: Andreas Korn <korn@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 19:02:47 +0200; Would be nice if they would do it. I'm in for it. Andreas Chris Tooley wrote: Now that XFS has got "official" support of the kernel gods, is there anyone leaning on RedHat to get it in their distribu; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00006.html (7,761 bytes)
3. Re: Distribution (score: 1): Author: Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx>; Date: 01 Oct 2002 11:34:09 -0700; The problem has been asked many times, and the answer is obvious: the more messages they'll get from their customers, the bigger the chances to include XFS in the distribution (in a non-hidden way, l; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00007.html (7,665 bytes)
4. 2.4.19 xfs oops report (score: 1): Author: h@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Date: 01 Oct 2002 11:49:02 -0500; without XFS in 2.5, we'll leave it to the maintainer to fix instead of increasing the delta of the XFS tree. The following file(s) were checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/i; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00784.html (6,662 bytes)
5. ps report (score: 1): Author: oley <ctooley@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 19:02:47 +0200; ay, I guess this got lost in the shuffle. You will need a recent xfsprogs version for this to work, there was a bug in xfs_db that broke the script. Also, this script has no; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00785.html (7,761 bytes)
6. Back out intermezzo compile 'fix' (score: 1): Author: Korn <korn@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 01 Oct 2002 11:34:09 -0700; checked into: bonnie.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: 2.4.x-xfs:slinx:128787a linux/fs/xfs/pagebuf/page_buf.h - 1.42 - Return ENOMEM for NULL pagebufs in pagebuf_g; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00786.html (7,665 bytes)
7. Distribution (score: 1): Author: Chris Tooley <ctooley@xxxxxxxx>; Date: 01 Oct 2002 11:49:02 -0500; Now that XFS has got "official" support of the kernel gods, is there anyone leaning on RedHat to get it in their distribution. I don't really want the XFS team to have to have the additional task (no; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01563.html (6,662 bytes)
8. Re: Distribution (score: 1): Author: Andreas Korn <korn@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2002 19:02:47 +0200; Would be nice if they would do it. I'm in for it. Andreas Chris Tooley wrote: Now that XFS has got "official" support of the kernel gods, is there anyone leaning on RedHat to get it in their distribu; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01564.html (7,689 bytes)
9. Re: Distribution (score: 1): Author: Florin Andrei <florin@xxxxxxx>; Date: 01 Oct 2002 11:34:09 -0700; The problem has been asked many times, and the answer is obvious: the more messages they'll get from their customers, the bigger the chances to include XFS in the distribution (in a non-hidden way, l; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01565.html (7,783 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]