Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Deprecating\s+xfs

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Deprecating\s+xfs_check\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Deprecating xfs_check (score: 1): Author: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:45:08 -0500; Hello All, Alex Elder mentioned about deprecating xfs_check, and he suggested is to replace xfs_check command with a script, that says xfs_check is deprecated, use "xfs_repair -n". Sounds ok ? Let me; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00248.html (6,980 bytes)
2. Re: Deprecating xfs_check (score: 1): Author: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 17:17:55 -0500; Hey Chandra, That sounds ok to me. You might also consider making xfs_check a hardlink to xfs_repair and varying the behavior based on program name. Then xfs_check == xfs_repair -n. Regards, Ben; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00249.html (7,764 bytes)
3. Re: Deprecating xfs_check (score: 1): Author: Troy McCorkell <tdm@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 18:01:12 -0500; Alex Elder mentioned about deprecating xfs_check, and he suggested is to replace xfs_check command with a script, that says xfs_check is deprecated, use "xfs_repair -n". Sounds ok ? Let me know if it; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00250.html (8,475 bytes)
4. Re: Deprecating xfs_check (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 11:04:07 +1000; [compendium reply] Yes. I'd suggest that you also put a removal date in the output, such as: "xfs_check is deprecated and scheduled for removal in June 2014. Please use xfs_repair -n <dev> instead."; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00256.html (11,604 bytes)
5. Re: Deprecating xfs_check (score: 1): Author: Troy McCorkell <tdm@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:41:48 -0500; On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 06:01:12PM -0500, Troy McCorkell wrote: On 04/11/2013 05:17 PM, Ben Myers wrote: Hey Chandra, Alex Elder mentioned about deprecating xfs_check, and he suggested is to replace; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00286.html (13,114 bytes)
6. Re: Deprecating xfs_check (score: 1): Author: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 12:27:46 -0500; Hello All, While trying to replace xfs_check with xfs_repair -n in xfstests, I found that xfs_check is quiet if all is well, and prints information only if something is wrong. But, xfs_repair -n alwa; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00366.html (13,598 bytes)
7. Re: Deprecating xfs_check (score: 1): Author: Alex Elder <elder@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2013 14:14:39 -0500; I like option 1 the best. But any of them is reasonable. -Alex . . .; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00457.html (8,914 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]