Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Curious\s+about\s+mount\s+options\s+and\s+Direct\s+IO\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Curious\s+about\s+mount\s+options\s+and\s+Direct\s+IO\.\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. fs failed on hppa (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: 24 Oct 2002 14:59:12 -0500; uped with the; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00570.html (7,154 bytes)
2. mpare Linux journalised filesystem, part II. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:05:21 -0700; newuname({sys="Linux", node="palinux", ...}) = 0 brk(0) = 0x60000 mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00571.html (7,929 bytes)
3. rious about mount options and Direct IO. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: 24 Oct 2002 15:10:18 -0500; ...}) = 0 brk(0) = 0x60000 mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00572.html (8,267 bytes)
4. rect IO. (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:37:24 -0700; question about XFS's capabilities to actually do anything in a DIO mode.I didn't see any mount options for DirectIO, just osyncisdsync. Our app is Oracl; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00574.html (9,036 bytes)
5. To compare Linux journalised filesystem, part II. (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxx>; Date: 24 Oct 2002 16:44:03 -0500; the original metadata change which allocated or freed space. So while we do not have data journalling, quota updates are journalled. Steve -- Steve Lord; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00577.html (8,660 bytes)
6. urious about mount options and Direct IO. (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxx>; Date: 24 Oct 2002 17:35:30 -0500; a few big files (they were ISO images). Why do XFS waste such time for deleting that files? Note: It happends to me a lot of times... Process: I make, re; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00580.html (8,816 bytes)
7. pare Linux journalised filesystem, part II. (score: 1): Author: kita Danilov <Nikita@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 24 Oct 2002 14:59:12 -0500; .19-aa1 + XFS + LVM + QLogic 2300's and 6.01 drivers. Removing LVM from the mix has, so far, kept us sane. I'm trying to scare up any information I can, because the we; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01349.html (7,154 bytes)
8. (score: 1): Author: n Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:05:21 -0700; g to scare up any information I can, because the we; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01350.html (7,929 bytes)
9. e Linux journalised filesystem, part II. (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: 24 Oct 2002 15:10:18 -0500; ecause the we; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01351.html (8,267 bytes)
10. s failed on hppa (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:37:24 -0700; ion and won't be grouped with the; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01353.html (9,036 bytes)
11. t IO. (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: 24 Oct 2002 16:44:03 -0500; abilities to actually do anything in a DIO mode.I didn't see any mount options for DirectIO, just osyncisdsync. Our app is Oracl; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01356.html (8,660 bytes)
12. ous about mount options and Direct IO. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx; Date: 24 Oct 2002 17:35:30 -0500; ange which allocated or freed space. So while we do not have data journalling, quota updates are journalled. Steve -- Steve Lord; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01359.html (8,816 bytes)
13. Curious about mount options and Direct IO. (score: 1): Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 24 Oct 2002 14:59:12 -0500; What benefits, if any, would we see by using direct IO with XFS on very large FS?(like 300 and 500GB FS) TIA Austin; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02128.html (7,154 bytes)
14. Re: Curious about mount options and Direct IO. (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:05:21 -0700; It depends what you are doing... --cw; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02129.html (8,047 bytes)
15. Re: Curious about mount options and Direct IO. (score: 1): Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 24 Oct 2002 15:10:18 -0500; I agree, but I guess my question was a general question about XFS's capabilities to actually do anything in a DIO mode.I didn't see any mount options for DirectIO, just osyncisdsync. Our app is Oracl; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02130.html (8,327 bytes)
16. Re: Curious about mount options and Direct IO. (score: 1): Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 13:37:24 -0700; XFS under Linux supports O_DIRECT. For some applications, it's a bug win, for others, it's not. O_DIRECT means reduced memcpy when doing a read reduced memcpy when doing a write *much* lower vm press; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02132.html (9,186 bytes)
17. Re: Curious about mount options and Direct IO. (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 24 Oct 2002 16:44:03 -0500; O_DIRECT is not a mount option, you open a file with that flag, and do I/O in a prescribed fashion. You can't "magically" get O_DIRECT behavior across a filesystem with just a mount option. An old pa; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02135.html (8,840 bytes)
18. Re: Curious about mount options and Direct IO. (score: 1): Author: Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 24 Oct 2002 17:35:30 -0500; Kewl Thanks Much! :); /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02138.html (8,910 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]