Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Concurrent\s+mount\s+of\s+XFS\s+over\s+SAN\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Concurrent\s+mount\s+of\s+XFS\s+over\s+SAN\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Concurrent mount of XFS over SAN (score: 1): Author: Heilige Gheist <hgheist@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:33:01 -0700 (PDT); Is there a way to prevent and/or detect concurrent mount of same XFS SAN-based partition from several nodes? I had to fsck a filesystem losing some data after two nodes happily mounted a filesystem f; /archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00020.html (7,812 bytes)
2. Re: Concurrent mount of XFS over SAN (score: 1): Author: Dave Lloyd <dlloyd@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:40:14 -0500; I think that the generally accepted way is to zone at the switch or the storage array. -- Dave Lloyd Test Engineer, Exegy, Inc. 314.450.5342 dlloyd@xxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00021.html (8,423 bytes)
3. Re: Concurrent mount of XFS over SAN (score: 1): Author: Heilige Gheist <hgheist@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 01:48:30 -0700 (PDT); That's 100% correct assuming you prohibit a shared access between the nodes. I didn't point out that we're dealing with filesystem failover setup. It's obvious that I can always fall back to the int; /archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00050.html (9,524 bytes)
4. Re: Concurrent mount of XFS over SAN (score: 1): Author: Jan-Frode Myklebust <mykleb@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 12:13:10 +0200; STONITH (Shoot The Other Node In The Head) trough smart power switches or management adapters in the node. SCSI reserve/release ... No idea how reliable this is on a SAN, but the ServeRAID-version wo; /archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00051.html (8,426 bytes)
5. Re: Concurrent mount of XFS over SAN (score: 1): Author: kris buggenhout <kris.buggenhout@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:01:54 +0200; afaik, the node was stored in xlv, which was an extra option in IRIX, ( extra license) but this could later be used in CXFS which allows multiple machines to mount the same FS read write from a SAN,; /archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00052.html (9,874 bytes)
6. RE: Concurrent mount of XFS over SAN (score: 1): Author: "Sebastian Brings" <sebas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:12:23 +0200; Maybe off topic meanwhile, but both Irix volume managers xlv and xvm have the owner stored in the header. Xvm also has an understanding of a cluster owning the volume, which is required for cxfs. In; /archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00053.html (10,899 bytes)
7. Concurrent mount of XFS over SAN (score: 1): Author:; Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 07:33:01 -0700 (PDT); Is there a way to prevent and/or detect concurrent mount of same XFS SAN-based partition from several nodes? I had to fsck a filesystem losing some data after two nodes happily mounted a filesystem f; /archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00272.html (7,812 bytes)
8. Re: Concurrent mount of XFS over SAN (score: 1): Author:; Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2006 16:40:14 -0500; I think that the generally accepted way is to zone at the switch or the storage array. -- Dave Lloyd Test Engineer, Exegy, Inc. 314.450.5342 dlloyd@xxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00273.html (8,423 bytes)
9. Re: Concurrent mount of XFS over SAN (score: 1): Author:; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 01:48:30 -0700 (PDT); That's 100% correct assuming you prohibit a shared access between the nodes. I didn't point out that we're dealing with filesystem failover setup. It's obvious that I can always fall back to the int; /archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00302.html (9,524 bytes)
10. Re: Concurrent mount of XFS over SAN (score: 1): Author:; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 12:13:10 +0200; STONITH (Shoot The Other Node In The Head) trough smart power switches or management adapters in the node. SCSI reserve/release ... No idea how reliable this is on a SAN, but the ServeRAID-version wo; /archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00303.html (8,426 bytes)
11. Re: Concurrent mount of XFS over SAN (score: 1): Author:; Date: Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:01:54 +0200; afaik, the node was stored in xlv, which was an extra option in IRIX, ( extra license) but this could later be used in CXFS which allows multiple machines to mount the same FS read write from a SAN,; /archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00304.html (9,874 bytes)
12. RE: Concurrent mount of XFS over SAN (score: 1): Author:; Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:12:23 +0200; Maybe off topic meanwhile, but both Irix volume managers xlv and xvm have the owner stored in the header. Xvm also has an understanding of a cluster owning the volume, which is required for cxfs. In; /archives/xfs/2006-08/msg00305.html (10,899 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]