- 1. : 2.4.19xfs + preempt causes hangs? (score: 1)
- Author: Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:46:56 -0600
- to have the impression that they can write a script based only on an idea. This is simil
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00687.html (7,806 bytes)
- 2. Re: XFS Logs on Another Device (score: 1)
- Author: .gifford1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:56:06 -0800
- most helpful, isolating bugs with the patch-set-du-jour can be rough. If you can't repr
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00688.html (7,834 bytes)
- 3. last question... (score: 1)
- Author: Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:54:47 -0600 (CST)
- ld be a horrible waste of space. :) LVM is very cool for things like this. Just define a 8-
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00690.html (8,996 bytes)
- 4. ion to mount (score: 1)
- Author: ndeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:07:47 +0100
- hard drive that I'd like to mount under Linux. I'm using kernel 2.4.19, and I have File systems --> Partition types --> SGI partition support compiled into the kernel, yet whe
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00691.html (8,760 bytes)
- 5. in xfs_trans_cancel (score: 1)
- Author: n <be@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:46:56 -0600
- e is no right hand side. In general callers of the block layer
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01466.html (7,806 bytes)
- 6. e_buf stuff (score: 1)
- Author: N (JSC-SF1) (JEC)" <alan.gifford1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:56:06 -0800
- i-backported the "ilookup" functions from 2.5, which do the sa
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01467.html (7,834 bytes)
- 7. Re: 2.4.19xfs + preempt causes hangs? (score: 1)
- Author: wood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:54:47 -0600 (CST)
- oblem seems to be different. If a process writes large files (abo
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01469.html (8,996 bytes)
- 8. : XFS Logs on Another Device (score: 1)
- Author: od <cw@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:07:47 +0100
- that they can write a script based only on an idea. This is simil
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01470.html (8,760 bytes)
- 9. Can't get my xfs partition to mount (score: 1)
- Author: "GIFFORD, ALAN (JSC-SF1) (JEC)" <alan.gifford1@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:46:56 -0600
- I have an externel SCSI hard drive that I'd like to mount under Linux. I'm using kernel 2.4.19, and I have File systems --> Partition types --> SGI partition support compiled into the kernel, yet whe
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02245.html (7,806 bytes)
- 10. Re: Can't get my xfs partition to mount (score: 1)
- Author: Chris Wedgwood <cw@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 11:56:06 -0800
- Did you compile XFS into the kernel or as a module? What does /proc/filesystems say? --cw
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02246.html (7,930 bytes)
- 11. Re: Can't get my xfs partition to mount (score: 1)
- Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 13:54:47 -0600 (CST)
- Hi Alan - There are a few caveats on using Irix disks, I think there is a list in the faq, for starters. If "mount" says that xfs is not supported, can you check to see whether you got any system mes
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02248.html (9,044 bytes)
- 12. Re: Can't get my xfs partition to mount (score: 1)
- Author: Seth Mos <knuffie@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 21:07:47 +0100
- Which kernel are you using? CVS, snapshot patches? File systems --> Partition types --> SGI partition support This is SGI partition label support. That just makes it possible to look at the different
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02249.html (8,818 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu