Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Acer\s+Aspire\s+1524WLMi\s+and\s+RealTek\s+8169\s+\-\s+very\s+slow\s*$/: 50 ]

Total 50 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1)

Author: ‹±æ˜Ž <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 05 Feb 2005 13:26:25 +0000

Francois Romieu wrote: Hi, could you give the patch below some testing ? Any post-LLTX-revert 2.6.11-rc2-bk should do. Merge of Realtek's code - code dedicated to a new phy (spotted by Richard Dawe)

/archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00169.html (11,464 bytes)

2. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1)

Author: u <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 21:41:35 +0100

Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : So it can be considered that the link detection issue is gone. Ok, I'll ask Jeff to submit it for mainline. If this test is (sys) CPU bound, then you should

/archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00173.html (11,073 bytes)

3. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1)

Author: t@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 10:54:59 +0000

Francois Romieu wrote: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] [snip] It works fine setting the speed & duplex using "ethtool -s eth0 autoneg off speed <speed> duplex <duplex>". Nice. Does

/archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00190.html (10,559 bytes)

4. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1)

Author: rkagan@xxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 23:00:59 +0000

Francois Romieu wrote: [snip] If you can do an extra test, I'd like to know if you can safely bring the r8169 interface down on your computer once the patch below if applied: http://www.fr.zoreil.co

/archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00270.html (12,160 bytes)

5. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1)

Author: ieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 01:07:32 +0100

Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : @#$*%! Patch against 2.6.11-rc3: http://www.fr.zoreil.com/people/francois/misc/20050211-2.6.11-rc3-r8169-test.patch Better ? Up-to-date patch-script version

/archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00406.html (9,792 bytes)

6. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1)

Author: xxxxxx>

Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 20:36:23 +0000

Francois Romieu wrote: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] I find that the "ip link set dev eth0 down" command hangs, consuming most of the CPU time (~99%). Note that I issued the "netw

/archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00478.html (10,886 bytes)

7. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1)

Author: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 13:51:21 +0000

Francois Romieu wrote: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] IRQ routing seems to be disabled in 2.6.10. I got a warning about an unhandled interrupt for the VIA 8255 (I think that's the

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00022.html (96,375 bytes)

8. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1)

Author: Richard Dawe <rich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 15:23:37 +0000

Richard Dawe wrote: Francois Romieu wrote: [snip] Could you send an updated dmesg, lspci -vvx, /proc/interrupts please ? Please see the attached, which are for running with 2.6.10. I included .confi

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00023.html (94,840 bytes)

9. 3c515 driver (score: 1)

Author: fen Klassert <klassert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 13:10:41 +0000

:56:16 2005 +++ linux-2.6.11-rc1/dr

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00995.html (9,758 bytes)

10. spire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1)

Author: xxxxxxx>

Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 15:22:57 +0000

er found the W32/Lovgate.x@MM!zip vir

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00996.html (14,337 bytes)

11. k audit (score: 1)

Author: e Venzano <webvenza@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 00:01:56 +0100

ebvenza@xxxxxxxxx> : [...] -- Ueimor

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01007.html (10,050 bytes)

12. problem (score: 1)

Author: Lemoine <eric.lemoine@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 19:08:34 +0000

would probably make sense to audit

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01022.html (12,548 bytes)

13. help (score: 1)

Author: xxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:47:25 +0100

this too and actually implemented it

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01121.html (15,472 bytes)

14. t routines (score: 1)

Author: xxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 14:00:22 -0800

ligned for the platform. I'm assumin

/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01180.html (9,207 bytes)

15. c Throughput puzzle (score: 1)

Author: xxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:17:50 +0000

ce benchmarking for 2.6.10 IPSec with 2.6 GHz P5s connected back-to-back with Gigabit connection. I'm using iperf for performance test. I'm really puzzled with

/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00802.html (9,751 bytes)

16. c Throughput puzzle (score: 1)

Author: me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:52:03 +0100

it seems that in case of null encryption, scatterwalk related code takes most of the cpu cycles. Tunnel mode ESP with null-encryption/sha1 (throughput 51MBits/

/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00814.html (8,842 bytes)

17. Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1)

Author: s Graf <tgraf@xxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:16:49 +0000

w

/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00764.html (103,971 bytes)

18. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1)

Author: e Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:24:52 +0000

h

/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00765.html (10,926 bytes)

19. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1)

Author: De Schuymer <bdschuym@xxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 19:47:33 +0000

m

/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00773.html (9,690 bytes)

20. Re: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi and RealTek 8169 - very slow (score: 1)

Author: ravamudan <nish.aravamudan@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 21:58:14 +0100

t

/archives/netdev/2004-11/msg00774.html (10,337 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2] [3]