Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*About\s+removing\s+files\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*About\s+removing\s+files\s*$/: 39 ]

Total 39 documents matching your query.

1. II. (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 00:06:39 +0200; in now, sorry! That's what I get for having too many changes in one workarea.... Missing bit of xfs_panic_mask The following file(s) were checked into: b; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00578.html (8,152 bytes)
2. t of xfs_panic_mask (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx; Date: 24 Oct 2002 17:10:18 -0500; le with that flag, and do I/O in a prescribed fashion. You can't "magically" get O_DIRECT behavior across a filesystem with just a mount option. An old pa; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00579.html (8,996 bytes)
3. mount options and Direct IO. (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 00:56:14 +0200; FS (if any)? In particular, does it support range locking? Regards, -James Goodwin Software Engineer IBM Global Services - Federal jagoodwi@xxxxxxxxxx Pho; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00583.html (10,014 bytes)
4. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:16:56 -0700; d, I have applied xfs_bmap to a few files... I get a lot of extents in some files and only a few of that in others. xfs_bmap -l xxxx.avi | wc -l --> 48800 xfs_bmap -l xxxx.iso | wc -l --> 115 Now; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00585.html (9,236 bytes)
5. : mkfs.xfs failed on hppa (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:18:20 +0200; e device driver? 2199023190016 is a fairly large byte offset. This ioctl is; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00589.html (9,214 bytes)
6. 2-pre2 athalon kernel rpm? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 01:33:09 -0700; results (thank you). My intention is to know why this situations may happend and why XFS is slow deleting files and directories. Well, if anybody has tim; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00591.html (9,263 bytes)
7. les (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:29:34 -0400; 0) machine with 1GB memory. The fs is exported via NFA and it was forced down when a user (on another machine) was deleting files off NFS. The kernel was; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00594.html (10,273 bytes)
8. on hppa (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 19:13:44 +0200; lvm2(any version) cause I've never had tried it. I don't use lvm heavily, so .... Maybe a good starting point would be the 1.0.5 release (the source code; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00606.html (9,579 bytes)
9. .4.18 xfs-1.1 (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:25:52 -0400; tried to get xfs on top of lvm on top of raid5 on top of some scsi disks to work. Here are some recent curiosities which for now seem to reconcile mount-; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00607.html (9,895 bytes)
10. last question... (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxx>; Date: 25 Oct 2002 14:31:26 -0500; der assistant to use XFS' file preallocation ioctls so that it allocates the full space in advance. Unfortuately they are not fully implemented on linux/; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00611.html (9,865 bytes)
11. ent dissections (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 22:00:06 +0200; nloading multiple sections of the file in parallel to different offsets then there may be issues getting reasonable allocation. Another possibility is you are a; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00613.html (11,034 bytes)
12. is the results of my last question... (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 13:19:11 -0700; s, I am downloading more than one file to the same directory (downloads directory :) and I obtain that results. Seen this results I am thinking about the c; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00615.html (9,942 bytes)
13. y (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxx>; Date: 25 Oct 2002 17:15:09 -0700; ies on a LRU list after use, this means the reference on the inode does not go away imediately. This allows us to get rid of the inode reference cache in; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00618.html (8,627 bytes)
14. t IO. (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 00:06:39 +0200; a /proc/sys/fs/xfs/panic_mask sysctl which can be set with this bitmask: this will cause various things that would normally just; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01357.html (8,152 bytes)
15. t xfs_panic_mask (score: 1): Author: sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 24 Oct 2002 17:10:18 -0500; in, for others, it's not. O_DIRECT means reduced memcpy when doing a read reduced memcpy when doing a write *much* lower vm press; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01358.html (8,996 bytes)
16. filesystem, part II. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 00:56:14 +0200; fashion. You can't "magically" get O_DIRECT behavior across a filesystem with just a mount option. An old pa; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01362.html (10,014 bytes)
17. k (score: 1): Author: xxxx; Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 16:16:56 -0700; , and how you create the iso. If your file is really fragmented then it might well take a while. If you are running the 1.1 release or earlier then yo; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01364.html (9,236 bytes)
18. XFS file locking questions (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:18:20 +0200; in others. xfs_bmap -l xxxx.avi | wc -l --> 48800 xfs_bmap -l xxxx.iso | wc -l --> 115 Now; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01368.html (9,214 bytes)
19. About removing files (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 01:33:09 -0700; arge are these files? XFS will try to minimize fra; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01370.html (9,263 bytes)
20. mkfs.xfs failed on hppa (score: 1): Author: xxx>; Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2002 07:29:34 -0400; tention is to know why this situations may happend and why XFS is slow deleting files and directories. Well, if anybody has tim; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01373.html (10,273 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]