Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*About\s+BUG\s+\#180\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*About\s+BUG\s+\#180\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. About BUG #180 (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 19:20:02 +0200; s on 6.0x drivers? TIA -- Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Coremetrics, Inc. Attachment: signatu; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00409.html (8,426 bytes)
2. Re: About BUG #180 (score: 1): Author: x; Date: 18 Oct 2002 12:20:40 -0500; re all of the PF_* flag values are unique, and < 32 bits. What are you merging? :) -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/proj; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00410.html (9,425 bytes)
3. Re: About BUG #180 (score: 1): Author: x; Date: 18 Oct 2002 12:55:15 -0500; try in bugzilla as well? (trying to train our user base to use bugzilla a bit more.) :) Thanks, -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://os; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00412.html (9,410 bytes)
4. Re: About BUG #180 (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 20:12:52 +0200; nal Comments From yoros@xxxxxxxxxx 2002-10-18 10:42 -- Created an attachment (id=40) --> (http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40&ac; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00413.html (9,008 bytes)
5. Re: About BUG #180 (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 08:14:35 +1000; ow_bug.cgi?id=180 -- Additional Comments From sandeen@xxxxxxx 2002-10-18 13:04 -- More info from Pedro: Now I have more information about that situation. It happends tha; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00417.html (9,080 bytes)
6. Re: About BUG #180 (score: 1): Author: x; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 01:23:32 +0200; he configuration as described in bug 182. Will give it a try... Eric? -- Luben; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00419.html (9,802 bytes)
7. roblem to compile on hppa (score: 1): Author: Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 19:20:02 +0200; stake somewhere but do not see which?) Thanks again for so quick answer, Joel; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01188.html (8,426 bytes)
8. le on hppa (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: 18 Oct 2002 12:20:40 -0500; sion: Current Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Prio; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01189.html (9,425 bytes)
9. logic 2300 and XFS (score: 1): Author: gzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: 18 Oct 2002 12:55:15 -0500; Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Coremetrics, Inc. Attachment: signatu; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01191.html (9,410 bytes)
10. Re: #define PF_FSTRANS (score: 1): Author: Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 20:12:52 +0200; lues are unique, and < 32 bits. What are you merging? :) -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/proj; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01192.html (9,008 bytes)
11. #define PF_FSTRANS (score: 1): Author: ikov <luben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 08:14:35 +1000; ter you run find+attr, but it works if you wait for everything to get on-disk? -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/x; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01196.html (9,080 bytes)
12. ast dump (score: 1): Author: gzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 01:23:32 +0200; umount and mount again and it seems to work well. This two reasons makes me think; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01198.html (9,802 bytes)
13. About BUG #180 (score: 1): Author: yoros@xxxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 19:20:02 +0200; Hi, I posted BUG number 180 related to "xfsdump" and "-e" option. It was that xfsdump didn't exclude files created after a level 0 dump but the attribute SGI_XFSDUMP_SKIP_FILE were added. Now I have; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01967.html (8,456 bytes)
14. Re: About BUG #180 (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 18 Oct 2002 12:20:40 -0500; Thanks for the extra info - can you add this to the bug entry in bugzilla as well? (trying to train our user base to use bugzilla a bit more.) :) Thanks, -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://os; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01968.html (9,528 bytes)
15. Re: About BUG #180 (score: 1): Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: 18 Oct 2002 12:55:15 -0500; Pedro - so, are you saying that it fails immediately after you run find+attr, but it works if you wait for everything to get on-disk? -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/x; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01970.html (9,513 bytes)
16. Re: About BUG #180 (score: 1): Author: yoros@xxxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 20:12:52 +0200; I can't be 100% sure of it, but in a few experiences, the more I wait, the less marked files are selected. I tried to umount and mount again and it seems to work well. This two reasons makes me think; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01971.html (9,131 bytes)
17. Re: About BUG #180 (score: 1): Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 08:14:35 +1000; You mean before xfsdump, right? (not after). cheers. -- Nathan; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01975.html (9,240 bytes)
18. Re: About BUG #180 (score: 1): Author: yoros@xxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 01:23:32 +0200; Yes. I was trying to say: "running sync and after that, run xfsdump". Pedro -- Pedro Martinez Juliá \ yoros@xxxxxxxx )| yoros@xxxxxxxxxx / http://yoros.cjb.net Socio HispaLinux #311 Usuario Linux #27; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01977.html (9,982 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]