Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.4\.29\,\s+e100\s+and\s+a\s+WOL\s+packet\s+causes\s+keventd\s+going\s+mad\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\.4\.29\,\s+e100\s+and\s+a\s+WOL\s+packet\s+causes\s+keventd\s+going\s+mad\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. -6 route shows incorrect route expiry times (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:18:49 +0100; 'ip[6:2] & 0x1fff != 0'. Perhaps you; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01362.html (9,302 bytes)
2. ules don't work correctly in 2.6.11-rc2-bk7 (score: 1): Author: ler" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 19:47:35 -0800; ining/reusing locals. Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01386.html (11,661 bytes)
3. 0 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad (score: 1): Author: hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:58:25 +1100; eaky screwdriver -- Richard Braakman; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01387.html (13,393 bytes)
4. td going mad (score: 1): Author: lap@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:23:47 -0800; 2) 6292 8028 Mob: +61 (417) 100 574; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01389.html (12,680 bytes)
5. td going mad (score: 1): Author:; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:00:15 -0800; u/~; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01391.html (12,069 bytes)
6. 2.6.11-rc1? (score: 1): Author: SHIFUJI Hideaki / å‰è—¤è‹±æ˜Ž <yoshfuji@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:14:16 +1100; seem to be a potential path for a n; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01398.html (10,688 bytes)
7. tbl not a public symbol in net/ipv6/ndisc.c (score: 1): Author: <akpm@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:08:03 +1100; olicing didn't work with IPv6 last time I checked. -- Hasso Tepper Elion Enterprises Ltd. WAN administrator; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01409.html (11,335 bytes)
8. 9 bug reports? (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:24:31 -0200; Martin - dale@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http:; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01459.html (10,771 bytes)
9. up IPv6 packets when using netfilter hooks (score: 1): Author: lsson@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 11:26:43 -0800; any of you guys test v2.6, please?; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01461.html (9,930 bytes)
10. and ah hangs (problem is in xfrm_state_add) (score: 1): Author: vid S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 21:29:42 +0100; eat way to do it. Cross your fingers; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01471.html (11,416 bytes)
11. and ah hangs (problem is in xfrm_state_add) (score: 1): Author: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:57:07 -0800; oes not help people with connection heavy access patterns. If you have a lot of people doing small transactions, ACK pacing as well as data traffic dropping is necessary. The; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01474.html (10,784 bytes)
12. 0 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad (score: 1): Author: <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:13:35 -0800; se, the loop is in userspace there.; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01475.html (11,588 bytes)
13. Re: 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad (score: 1): Author: David Härdeman <david@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 18:18:49 +0100; Hi, I experience the same problems as reported by Michael Gernoth when sending a WOL-packet to computer with a e100 NIC which is already powered on. In my case, it's running kernel 2.6.8.1 and the NI; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02852.html (9,364 bytes)
14. Re: 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad (score: 1): Author: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 19:47:35 -0800; I didn't look at the 2.4 case, but for 2.6, it seems e100 was enabling PME wakeup during probe. PME shouldn't be enabled while the system is up. I suspect the assertion of PME while the system is up; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02876.html (11,719 bytes)
15. Re: 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad (score: 1): Author: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:58:25 +1100; Hi. Do you also disable the WOL event when resuming? Regards, Nigel -- Nigel Cunningham Software Engineer, Canberra, Australia http://www.cyclades.com Ph: +61 (2) 6292 8028 Mob: +61 (417) 100 574; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02877.html (13,535 bytes)
16. Re: 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad (score: 1): Author: Bukie Mabayoje <bukiemab@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 20:23:47 -0800; This issue was reported on 2.4.; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02879.html (12,773 bytes)
17. Re: 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad (score: 1): Author: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 21:00:15 -0800; Good catch. How's this look? -- linux-2.6.11-rc2/drivers/net/e100.c.orig 2005-01-30 19:13:56.850497376 -0800 +++ linux-2.6.11-rc2/drivers/net/e100.c 2005-01-30 20:53:22.630560952 -0800 @@ -1868,7 +18; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02881.html (12,198 bytes)
18. Re: 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad (score: 1): Author: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:14:16 +1100; Hi. I looked at it last week because I used it for an example of device model drivers at the CELF conference. I got your intel address from the top of the .c file, but IIRC it bounced. Providence :>; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02888.html (10,867 bytes)
19. Re: 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad (score: 1): Author: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 20:08:03 +1100; Hi again. Ignore that :> I realised later that there's only one badly named routine and my assumption that there was another called disable_.. was wrong :> Nigel -- Nigel Cunningham Software Engineer; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02899.html (11,546 bytes)
20. Re: 2.4.29, e100 and a WOL packet causes keventd going mad (score: 1): Author: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:24:31 -0200; Can any of you guys test v2.6, please?; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02949.html (10,884 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]