Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[patches\]\s+2\.6\.0\-test9\s+\-\s+r8169\s+DMA\s+API\s+conversion\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: inger@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 01:00:56 +0100

Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> : Ok, will do (hmmm... looks like a free ticket for "Whitespace attacks"). I have attached the usual DMA rework for: - the Tx descriptors; - the Rx process (with the o

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00405.html (11,069 bytes)

2. Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: minger@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:08:27 -0500

Just because I'm way to lazy to actually look, is this against the original r8169, or my patch from the v1.6 driver ?? -Brad Francois Romieu wrote: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> : [...] hehe. I cer

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00406.html (31,744 bytes)

3. Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: mminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 01:45:50 +0100

Brad House <brad@xxxxxxxx> : It is against the original r8169. Once finished, it should look like: - first cut at dma api conversion (today) - remaining bits of dma api conversion (tomorrow) - rx_cop

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00407.html (10,852 bytes)

4. Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:59:30 -0500

any reason why it's not against the v1.6 ? the current driver is missing support for the 8110S chip (or at least it doesn't seem to work at all), so you're cutting out all the chips on the mobos out

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00408.html (11,887 bytes)

5. Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: ncois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 02:34:12 +0100

I think you misunderstood. If I intepret the list correctly, the 1.6 changes are in that list (as "your changes (week-end)".) IIRC, the realtek one got cleaned up a great deal before entering mainlin

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00410.html (11,752 bytes)

6. Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: xxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:35:46 -0500

yes, I definately misunderstood then ... I'll just apply the patches to my version and see what happens ;) -Brad Andre Tomt wrote: On Thu, 2003-11-20 at 01:59, Brad House wrote: any reason why it's n

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00411.html (12,781 bytes)

7. Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: xxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:36:52 -0500

ok, misunderstood again ... geez .... now I get it ... he'll apply the 1.6 patch this weekend ... _sigh_ I really must be brain dead today. -Brad Brad House wrote: yes, I definately misunderstood the

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00412.html (13,293 bytes)

8. Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:36:52 -0500

Brad House wrote: any reason why it's not against the v1.6 ? the current driver is missing support for the 8110S chip (or at least it doesn't seem to work at all), so you're cutting out all the chips

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00416.html (10,944 bytes)

9. Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: k <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 01:36:37 +0100

Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> : The attached patches apply on top of yesterday's ones: r8169-start-xmit-fixes.patch r8169-dma-api-tx-buffers.patch r8169-rx_copybreak.patch Bugs apart, there

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00441.html (10,765 bytes)

10. Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: stevens@xxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:38:37 -0500

The rx_copybreak didn't apply, but everything else did. Thanks much. Just posted a new net-drivers-2.5-exp patch, to which you may sync with. Jeff

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00442.html (9,793 bytes)

11. Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: xxxxxxxxx (SVR Anand)

Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2003 00:20:02 +0100

Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> : Oops, I forgot there was an extra MODULE_LICENSE() in net-drivers-2.5-exp. Updated rx_copybreak attached. -- Ueimor Attachment: r8169-rx_copybreak.patch Description:

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg00448.html (10,174 bytes)

12. [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 01:00:56 +0100

Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> : [...] Ok, will do (hmmm... looks like a free ticket for "Whitespace attacks"). I have attached the usual DMA rework for: - the Tx descriptors; - the Rx process (with

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg01018.html (11,257 bytes)

13. Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: Brad House <brad@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:08:27 -0500

Just because I'm way to lazy to actually look, is this against the original r8169, or my patch from the v1.6 driver ?? -Brad hehe. I certainly don't object... You probably want to look over the r8169

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg01019.html (35,060 bytes)

14. Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 01:45:50 +0100

Brad House <brad@xxxxxxxx> : It is against the original r8169. Once finished, it should look like: - first cut at dma api conversion (today) - remaining bits of dma api conversion (tomorrow) - rx_cop

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg01020.html (11,090 bytes)

15. Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: Brad House <brad@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 19:59:30 -0500

any reason why it's not against the v1.6 ? the current driver is missing support for the 8110S chip (or at least it doesn't seem to work at all), so you're cutting out all the chips on the mobos out

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg01021.html (11,916 bytes)

16. Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: Andre Tomt <andre@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 02:34:12 +0100

I think you misunderstood. If I intepret the list correctly, the 1.6 changes are in that list (as "your changes (week-end)".) IIRC, the realtek one got cleaned up a great deal before entering mainlin

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg01023.html (12,003 bytes)

17. Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: Brad House <brad@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:35:46 -0500

yes, I definately misunderstood then ... sorry ;) I'll just apply the patches to my version and see what happens ;) -Brad any reason why it's not against the v1.6 ? I think you misunderstood. If I in

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg01024.html (12,897 bytes)

18. Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: Brad House <brad@xxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:36:52 -0500

ok, misunderstood again ... geez .... now I get it ... he'll apply the 1.6 patch this weekend ... _sigh_ I really must be brain dead today. -Brad -Brad any reason why it's not against the v1.6 ? I th

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg01025.html (13,351 bytes)

19. Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 20:36:52 -0500

Brad House wrote: any reason why it's not against the v1.6 ? the current driver is missing support for the 8110S chip (or at least it doesn't seem to work at all), so you're cutting out all the chips

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg01029.html (11,135 bytes)

20. Re: [patches] 2.6.0-test9 - r8169 DMA API conversion (score: 1)

Author: Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 01:36:37 +0100

Francois Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> : [...] The attached patches apply on top of yesterday's ones: r8169-start-xmit-fixes.patch r8169-dma-api-tx-buffers.patch r8169-rx_copybreak.patch Bugs apart,

/archives/netdev/2003-11/msg01054.html (10,986 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]