Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[patch\s+2\.6\.9\s+0\/11\]\s+Add\s+MODULE_VERSION\s+to\s+several\s+network\s+drivers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[patch\s+2\.6\.9\s+0\/11\]\s+Add\s+MODULE_VERSION\s+to\s+several\s+network\s+drivers\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [patch 2.6.9 0/11] Add MODULE_VERSION to several network drivers (score: 1): Author: xx>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:11:46 -0400; Patches to add MODULE_VERSION lines to several network drivers... Here is the list: tg3 e100 e1000 b44 tulip 3c59x 8139too ns83820 r8169 bonding vlan Individual patches to follow... John -- John W. L; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg00767.html (9,982 bytes)
2. Re: [patch 2.6.9 0/11] Add MODULE_VERSION to several network drivers (score: 1): Author: te <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:17:49 +0200; have you checked if the version of these drivers is actually useful? (eg updated when the driver changes) If it's not I'd say adding a MODULE_VERSION to it makes no sense whatsoever.; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg00844.html (10,505 bytes)
3. Re: [patch 2.6.9 0/11] Add MODULE_VERSION to several network drivers (score: 1): Author: <laforge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 08:22:05 -0400; Why do I feel like I'm being baited...? :-) I would have to suspect that if a version string exists, that it has at least some meaning to the primary developers/maintainters. It certainly is beyond m; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg00879.html (12,244 bytes)
4. Re: [patch 2.6.9 0/11] Add MODULE_VERSION to several network drivers (score: 1): Author: ille" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:46:11 +0200; Since the skeleton driver includes a define for that, I suspect your assumption is a bit overly optimistic. Not really. I have absolutely no problem with a MODULE_VERSION macro *IF* the version it ad; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg00881.html (11,493 bytes)
5. Re: [patch 2.6.9 0/11] Add MODULE_VERSION to several network drivers (score: 1): Author: sky-Bree <lmb@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 08:55:09 -0400; Perhaps...still, at least the drivers I touched w/ these patches seem to have version numbers that are at least somewhat meaningful. Again, I think it would have to be the maintainer's responsibilit; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg00882.html (12,707 bytes)
6. Re: [patch 2.6.9 0/11] Add MODULE_VERSION to several network drivers (score: 1): Author: an@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:11:17 +0200; absolutely; however you're not the maintainer of all of the ones you patched... and I still argue that until the number is meaningful exporting it as meaning something is more harm than good.; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg00883.html (11,056 bytes)
7. Re: [patch 2.6.9 0/11] Add MODULE_VERSION to several network drivers (score: 1): Author: rge@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:33:22 -0400; As you say, I'm not the maintainer. I just proposed the patches. It seems you are not really talking to me. Instead, you are telling the maintainers that by applying these patches, they should be com; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg00886.html (12,076 bytes)
8. [patch 2.6.9 0/11] Add MODULE_VERSION to several network drivers (score: 1): Author: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 14:11:46 -0400; Patches to add MODULE_VERSION lines to several network drivers... Here is the list: tg3 e100 e1000 b44 tulip 3c59x 8139too ns83820 r8169 bonding vlan Individual patches to follow... John -- John W. L; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg02265.html (9,982 bytes)
9. Re: [patch 2.6.9 0/11] Add MODULE_VERSION to several network drivers (score: 1): Author: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 11:17:49 +0200; have you checked if the version of these drivers is actually useful? (eg updated when the driver changes) If it's not I'd say adding a MODULE_VERSION to it makes no sense whatsoever.; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg02342.html (10,561 bytes)
10. Re: [patch 2.6.9 0/11] Add MODULE_VERSION to several network drivers (score: 1): Author: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 08:22:05 -0400; Why do I feel like I'm being baited...? :-) I would have to suspect that if a version string exists, that it has at least some meaning to the primary developers/maintainters. It certainly is beyond m; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg02377.html (12,377 bytes)
11. Re: [patch 2.6.9 0/11] Add MODULE_VERSION to several network drivers (score: 1): Author: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 15:46:11 +0200; Since the skeleton driver includes a define for that, I suspect your assumption is a bit overly optimistic. Not really. I have absolutely no problem with a MODULE_VERSION macro *IF* the version it ad; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg02379.html (11,611 bytes)
12. Re: [patch 2.6.9 0/11] Add MODULE_VERSION to several network drivers (score: 1): Author: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 08:55:09 -0400; Perhaps...still, at least the drivers I touched w/ these patches seem to have version numbers that are at least somewhat meaningful. Again, I think it would have to be the maintainer's responsibilit; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg02380.html (12,901 bytes)
13. Re: [patch 2.6.9 0/11] Add MODULE_VERSION to several network drivers (score: 1): Author: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 16:11:17 +0200; absolutely; however you're not the maintainer of all of the ones you patched... and I still argue that until the number is meaningful exporting it as meaning something is more harm than good.; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg02381.html (11,235 bytes)
14. Re: [patch 2.6.9 0/11] Add MODULE_VERSION to several network drivers (score: 1): Author: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:33:22 -0400; As you say, I'm not the maintainer. I just proposed the patches. It seems you are not really talking to me. Instead, you are telling the maintainers that by applying these patches, they should be com; /archives/netdev/2004-10/msg02384.html (12,331 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]