Results:
References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[patch\s+1\/2\]\s+cancel_rearming_delayed_work\(\)\s*$/: 4 ]
Total 4 documents matching your query.
- 1. causes keventd going mad (score: 1)
- Author: <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 22:33:01 -0800
- IIRC it bounced. Providence :> [..
- /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01400.html (9,117 bytes)
- 2. take affect through a system("foo") call?? (score: 1)
- Author: suyuki KOZAKAI <yasuyuki.kozakai@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 22:41:49 -0800
- rton <akpm@xxxxxxxx> -- 25-akpm/net
- /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01403.html (7,969 bytes)
- 3. [patch 1/2] cancel_rearming_delayed_work() (score: 1)
- Author: akpm@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 22:33:01 -0800
- cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue() is only used inside workqueue.c; make this function static (the more useful wrapper around it later in that function remains non-static and exported) Signed-off-by
- /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02890.html (9,117 bytes)
- 4. Re: [patch 1/2] cancel_rearming_delayed_work() (score: 1)
- Author: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 22:41:49 -0800
- hmm, actually, had I paid any attention to Arjan's patch I'd have dropped it ;) cancel_rearming_delayed_workqueue() make sense and should be part of the workqueue API, even if nothing uses it yet. Wh
- /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02893.html (8,035 bytes)
Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by
Namazu