Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[patch\]\s+reduce\s+log\s+I\/O\s+latency\s+V2\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [patch] reduce log I/O latency V2 (score: 1)

Author:

Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:16:49 +1100

Reduce log I/O latency To ensure that log I/O is issued as the highest priority I/O, set the I/O priority of the log I/O to the highest possible. This will ensure that log I/O is not held up behind b

/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00151.html (10,229 bytes)

2. Re: [patch] reduce log I/O latency V2 (score: 1)

Author:

Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:42:13 +1100

Looks good Dave. Shouldn't we also tag the second buffer in the split log write case? David Chinner wrote: Reduce log I/O latency To ensure that log I/O is issued as the highest priority I/O, set the

/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00173.html (11,208 bytes)

3. Re: [patch] reduce log I/O latency V2 (score: 1)

Author:

Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:58:17 +1100

Hmm - I thought it was being tagged. looks like I missed a reject on my last set of patch re-orderings - updated patch attached. -- Reduce log I/O latency To ensure that log I/O is issued as the high

/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00175.html (11,499 bytes)

4. Re: [patch] reduce log I/O latency V2 (score: 1)

Author:

Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:07:40 +1100

Yup, all good now. David Chinner wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 02:42:13PM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: Looks good Dave. Shouldn't we also tag the second buffer in the split log write case? Hmm - I

/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00176.html (12,107 bytes)

5. [patch] reduce log I/O latency V2 (score: 1)

Author: >

Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:16:49 +1100

Reduce log I/O latency To ensure that log I/O is issued as the highest priority I/O, set the I/O priority of the log I/O to the highest possible. This will ensure that log I/O is not held up behind b

/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00390.html (10,229 bytes)

6. Re: [patch] reduce log I/O latency V2 (score: 1)

Author: >

Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:42:13 +1100

Looks good Dave. Shouldn't we also tag the second buffer in the split log write case? David Chinner wrote: Reduce log I/O latency To ensure that log I/O is issued as the highest priority I/O, set the

/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00412.html (11,208 bytes)

7. Re: [patch] reduce log I/O latency V2 (score: 1)

Author: >

Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:58:17 +1100

Hmm - I thought it was being tagged. looks like I missed a reject on my last set of patch re-orderings - updated patch attached. -- Reduce log I/O latency To ensure that log I/O is issued as the high

/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00414.html (11,499 bytes)

8. Re: [patch] reduce log I/O latency V2 (score: 1)

Author: >

Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 16:07:40 +1100

Yup, all good now. David Chinner wrote: On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 02:42:13PM +1100, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: Looks good Dave. Shouldn't we also tag the second buffer in the split log write case? Hmm - I

/archives/xfs/2008-01/msg00415.html (12,107 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]