Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[TARBALL\]\s+xfsprogs\:\s+fixes\s+and\s+updates\s+to\s+current\s+kernel\s+code\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [TARBALL] xfsprogs: fixes and updates to current kernel code (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:13:00 +1000
Hi folks, The attached tarball contains the following patches and a series file: xfs_repair: validate on-disk extent count better xfs_logprint: print all AGI unlinked buckets xfs_fsr: file reads shou
/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00658.html (14,872 bytes)

2. Re: [TARBALL] xfsprogs: fixes and updates to current kernel code (score: 1)
Author: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:22:12 -0500
Hi folks, The attached tarball contains the following patches and a series file: xfs_repair: validate on-disk extent count better Looks okay. xfs_logprint: print all AGI unlinked buckets I understand
/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00661.html (9,408 bytes)

3. Re: [TARBALL] xfsprogs: fixes and updates to current kernel code (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 06:11:37 +1000
Because we may only log partial regions of the AGI. The size of the region determines how many unlinked buckets are in the region that can be printed.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00670.html (8,840 bytes)

4. Re: [TARBALL] xfsprogs: fixes and updates to current kernel code (score: 1)
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 02:22:08 -0400
All the patches look good to me, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> But I think at least patch 1, maybe 2 and 3 aswell should be submitted for the pending release.
/archives/xfs/2013-05/msg00000.html (7,143 bytes)

5. Re: [TARBALL] xfsprogs: fixes and updates to current kernel code (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 16:28:33 +1000
If the SGI guys want to take them, I'm happy for that to occur. As it is, I've got another bug fix to xfs_logprint (fixes xfs/295) and I found a significant xfs-db regression as a result of the dirv1
/archives/xfs/2013-05/msg00001.html (8,321 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu