Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[RFC\s+2\.6\.10\s+3\/22\]\s+xfrm\:\s+Add\s+offload\s+management\s+routines\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. TSO on/off is supposed to be the same yes? (score: 1)
Author: d S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:47:38 -0800
rbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Home Pag
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00974.html (8,606 bytes)

2. f offloads (score: 1)
Author: xxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 01:00:35 -0500
fload_release() releases it when th
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg00991.html (9,843 bytes)

3. rm: Add direction information to xfrm_state (score: 1)
Author: x>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:30:39 -0500
Not that I know any entity interes
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01178.html (10,114 bytes)

4. g of mutable fields (score: 1)
Author: low <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 03:48:35 -0500
xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> diff -Nru a/net/ipv4/ah4.c b/net/ipv4/ah4.c -- a/net/ipv4/ah4.c 2004-12-30 01:10:27 -05:00 +++ b/n
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00841.html (16,040 bytes)

5. Re: [RFC 2.6.10 3/22] xfrm: Add offload management routines (score: 1)
Author: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 14:47:38 -0800
This whole scheme looks buggy. The intent is to 8-byte align the object, but look at what the code is actually doing. Whatever kmalloc() returns to xfrm_offload_alloc() is directly used as the xfrm_o
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02464.html (8,765 bytes)

6. Re: [RFC 2.6.10 3/22] xfrm: Add offload management routines (score: 1)
Author: David Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 01:00:35 -0500
[ Sorry, David, if you get this multiple times. Had a doh! moment... ] Right, I'm not worried about the alignment of the xfrm_offload, as I'm assuming that kmalloc will give us something suitable. Ho
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02481.html (10,023 bytes)

7. Re: [RFC 2.6.10 3/22] xfrm: Add offload management routines (score: 1)
Author: David Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 16:30:39 -0500
I must be missing something, since I only need to ensure the items in struct xfrm_offload are aligned correctly -- the pointers in the first list_head need to be aligned for the platform. I'm assumin
/archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02668.html (10,447 bytes)

8. [RFC 2.6.10 3/22] xfrm: Add offload management routines (score: 1)
Author: David Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 03:48:35 -0500
Signed-off-by: David Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: David Dillow <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01792.html (16,065 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]


This search system is powered by Namazu