Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+v2\]\s+xfs\:\s+fix\s+assertion\s+failure\s+in\s+xfs_vm_write_failed\(\)\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH v2] xfs: fix assertion failure in xfs_vm_write_failed() (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 12:48:16 +0800
Hello, Here is the v2 patch for fixing ASSERTION failed at xfs_vm_write_failed() according to Dave's comments, so I added Dave as SOB for credit. Hi Michael, Please kindly try at your at your conveni
/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg00540.html (10,738 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: fix assertion failure in xfs_vm_write_failed() (score: 1)
Author: "Michael L. Semon" <mlsemon35@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:03:11 -0400
Looks good in limited testing. I set some extra debug code somewhere, causing every failed mount in xfstests #078 to show up, so the original test cases were double-checked, both on the main partitio
/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg00560.html (11,346 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: fix assertion failure in xfs_vm_write_failed() (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 10:30:26 +1100
No, please don't add my SOB to a patch you wrote, even if I came up with the idea of how to do something. A SOB indicates that someone has verified the origin of the patch (e.g. for copyright reasons
/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg00572.html (10,390 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: fix assertion failure in xfs_vm_write_failed() (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:08:27 +0800
Ah, got it! :-P. Indeed, the patch is improved as following: In xfs_vm_write_failed(), we evaluate the block_offset of pos with PAGE_MASK which is 0xfffff000 as an unsigned long, that is fine on 64-b
/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg00584.html (15,981 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: fix assertion failure in xfs_vm_write_failed() (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 06:23:22 +1100
That's the 32 bit value. if it's a 64 bit value, it's 0xfffffffffffff000. So I'd just rearrange this slightly: ... Saying we are clearing the lower 12 bits is not technically correct, as there are pl
/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg00608.html (12,499 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: fix assertion failure in xfs_vm_write_failed() (score: 1)
Author: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 10:18:04 +0800
Thanks Dave for correcting me with detailed comments, the revised patch was shown as following. Regards, -Jeff In xfs_vm_write_failed(), we evaluate the block_offset of pos with PAGE_MASK which is an
/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg00629.html (18,153 bytes)

7. Re: [PATCH v2] xfs: fix assertion failure in xfs_vm_write_failed() (score: 1)
Author: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 16:47:58 -0500
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner<dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> Thanks Dave for correcting me with detailed comments, the revised patch was shown as following. Regards, -Jeff In xfs_vm_write_failed(), we evaluate the
/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00147.html (12,034 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu