Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+V2\]\s+xfstests\s+generic\/306\s+fixes\s+and\s+updates\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH V2] xfstests generic/306 fixes and updates (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 11:09:54 -0500
older xfs_io refused to write to /dev/null because it's not a file on an xfs filesystem. So add -F. While we're at it, add more testcases: * symlink on a RO fs pointing to a file on a RW fs. * bind-m
/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00635.html (10,977 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH V2] xfstests generic/306 fixes and updates (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:40:52 +1000
You could just do: export XFS_IO_PROG="$XFS_IO_PROG -F" and not have to change so much of the test. And with a comment it would make it obvious to a future ready why the -F flag is used ;) Cheers, Da
/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00648.html (8,061 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH V2] xfstests generic/306 fixes and updates (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:16:59 -0500
Well, it's not just this test; it's any non-xfs-specific test which uses xfs_io for anything at all. We have -F's sprinkled through many tests for that reason, even though -F is deprecated upstream.
/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00659.html (9,438 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH V2] xfstests generic/306 fixes and updates (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 06:09:40 +1000
OK, sounds like we should detect if it is needed when setting up XFS_IO_PROG in common/config rather than changing every test.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00669.html (9,776 bytes)

5. Re: [PATCH V2] xfstests generic/306 fixes and updates (score: 1)
Author: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:40:33 -0500
It's just these 2 for now; I'd like to see if we can go ahead & merge this as is and I'll follow up with something to change over every non-xfs-specific test to DTRT, ok? Thanks, -Eric
/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00671.html (10,407 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH V2] xfstests generic/306 fixes and updates (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 06:44:45 +1000
That's fine by me.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00672.html (10,691 bytes)

7. Re: [PATCH V2] xfstests generic/306 fixes and updates (score: 1)
Author: Rich Johnston <rjohnston@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 09:54:20 -0500
Thanks Eric, this has been committed. --Rich xfstests generic/306 fixes and updates
/archives/xfs/2013-05/msg00110.html (7,690 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu