Results:
References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+PKT_SCHED\s+17\/17\]\:\s+Disable\s+broken\s+override\s+bits\s+in\s+pedit\s+action\s*$/: 6 ]
Total 6 documents matching your query.
- 1. s in tcf_pedit_init (score: 1)
- Author: k McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 04:41:51 +0100
- nit. Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> diff -Nru a/net/sched/pedit.c b/net/sched/pedit.c -- a/n
- /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00833.html (8,313 bytes)
- 2. for all classifiers (score: 1)
- Author: xxxx>
- Date: 30 Dec 2004 08:17:14 -0500
- x> -- linux-2.6.10-bk1.orig/net/sched/Kconfig 2004-12-27 14:32:33.000000000 +0100 +++ linux-2.6.10-bk1/net/sched/Kconfig 2004-12-27 22:47:22.000000000 +0100 @@
- /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00874.html (8,809 bytes)
- 3. its in pedit action (score: 1)
- Author: @xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:25:08 +0100
- ve (ipt being other). Could you just add a check for size before returning -EOPNOTSUPP? Example: if (ovr) if (p->nkeys != parm->nkeys) return -EOPNOTSUPP; This
- /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg00875.html (8,303 bytes)
- 4. [PATCH PKT_SCHED 17/17]: Disable broken override bits in pedit action (score: 1)
- Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 04:41:51 +0100
- Disable broken override bits in pedit action. It misses locking and needs to allocate new memory if nkeys increases. Also disable it for now. Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-o
- /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01784.html (8,311 bytes)
- 5. Re: [PATCH PKT_SCHED 17/17]: Disable broken override bits in pedit action (score: 1)
- Author: jamal <hadi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Dec 2004 08:17:14 -0500
- There are a couple of these that you have (ipt being other). Could you just add a check for size before returning -EOPNOTSUPP? Example: if (ovr) if (p->nkeys != parm->nkeys) return -EOPNOTSUPP; This
- /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01825.html (8,857 bytes)
- 6. Re: [PATCH PKT_SCHED 17/17]: Disable broken override bits in pedit action (score: 1)
- Author: Patrick McHardy <kaber@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 14:25:08 +0100
- This way if they are of the same size then things should work as is and my testcases dont break. Now if you feel more gracious, go ahead and fix them ;-> Yes, this patch was silly, I should have jus
- /archives/netdev/2004-12/msg01826.html (8,352 bytes)
Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by
Namazu