Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+2\.6\.12\-rc2\s+0\/17\]\s+bonding\:\s+sysfs\s+interface\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+2\.6\.12\-rc2\s+0\/17\]\s+bonding\:\s+sysfs\s+interface\.\.\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2 0/17] bonding: sysfs interface... (score: 1): Author: Radheka Godse <radheka.godse@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:15:24 -0700 (PDT); This patch set implements the sysfs interface for bonding and has a couple bug fixes. We have done a full test pass and consider these patches ready for inclusion upstream. We have submitted them to; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg00365.html (10,138 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2 0/17] bonding: sysfs interface... (score: 1): Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:09:34 -0700; I'm not adverse to sysfs per say, but you are using like /proc with multiple values per file. This is not what the original design was. Examples: +static ssize_t bonding_show_stat(struct class_device; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg00382.html (13,265 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2 0/17] bonding: sysfs interface... (score: 1): Author: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:41:15 -0700; [...] If by "ABI version exported," you're referring to this (and the associated calls): +int bond_check_abi_ver(void) +{ + int retval = 1; + + if (orig_app_abi_ver == -1) { + orig_app_abi_ver = BOND; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg00386.html (8,874 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2 0/17] bonding: sysfs interface... (score: 1): Author: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:53:19 -0400; I, for one, view these patches as very welcome. I intend to comment further later, but for now... FC3 users are invited to use the test kernels here: http://people.redhat.com/linville/kernels/fc3/ I; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg00402.html (8,907 bytes)
5. [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2 0/17] bonding: sysfs interface... (score: 1): Author: Radheka Godse <radheka.godse@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:15:24 -0700 (PDT); This patch set implements the sysfs interface for bonding and has a couple bug fixes. We have done a full test pass and consider these patches ready for inclusion upstream. We have submitted them to; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg01501.html (10,144 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2 0/17] bonding: sysfs interface... (score: 1): Author: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@xxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 17:09:34 -0700; I'm not adverse to sysfs per say, but you are using like /proc with multiple values per file. This is not what the original design was. Examples: +static ssize_t bonding_show_stat(struct class_device; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg01518.html (13,347 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2 0/17] bonding: sysfs interface... (score: 1): Author: Jay Vosburgh <fubar@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 17:41:15 -0700; [...] If by "ABI version exported," you're referring to this (and the associated calls): +int bond_check_abi_ver(void) +{ + int retval = 1; + + if (orig_app_abi_ver == -1) { + orig_app_abi_ver = BOND; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg01522.html (8,950 bytes)
8. Re: [PATCH 2.6.12-rc2 0/17] bonding: sysfs interface... (score: 1): Author: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 12:53:19 -0400; I, for one, view these patches as very welcome. I intend to comment further later, but for now... FC3 users are invited to use the test kernels here: http://people.redhat.com/linville/kernels/fc3/ I; /archives/netdev/2005-04/msg01538.html (9,004 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]