Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+2\.6\]\s+e100\:\s+remove\s+reference\s+to\s+NAPI\s+config\s+option\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+2\.6\]\s+e100\:\s+remove\s+reference\s+to\s+NAPI\s+config\s+option\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [PATCH 2.6] e100: remove reference to NAPI config option (score: 1): Author: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:25:33 -0500; Just curious...wanna try this patch I got from Intel? I think it may help... John -- linux-2.6.9/drivers/net/e100.c.napifix 2005-01-25 15:54:28.830937362 -0500 +++ linux-2.6.9/drivers/net/e100.c 2005; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00008.html (15,447 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH 2.6] e100: remove reference to NAPI config option (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:29:25 -0500; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg00031.html (7,476 bytes)
3. BM EMAC driver (score: 1): Author: s Romieu <romieu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:22:32 -0800; ted == -- 1.3/drivers/net/ibm_emac/i; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01486.html (8,916 bytes)
4. fig option (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:43:58 +1100; 5-01-31 17:10:44.900111944 -0800 ++; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01488.html (8,182 bytes)
5. 100: remove reference to NAPI config option (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:04:28 -0800; to be plugged in (in tc this is alr; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg01489.html (8,154 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH 2.6] e100: remove reference to NAPI config option (score: 1): Author: "John W. Linville" <linville@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:25:33 -0500; Just curious...wanna try this patch I got from Intel? I think it may help... John -- linux-2.6.9/drivers/net/e100.c.napifix 2005-01-25 15:54:28.830937362 -0500 +++ linux-2.6.9/drivers/net/e100.c 2005; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01028.html (15,622 bytes)
7. Re: [PATCH 2.6] e100: remove reference to NAPI config option (score: 1): Author: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 00:29:25 -0500; applied; /archives/netdev/2005-02/msg01051.html (7,588 bytes)
8. [PATCH 2.6] e100: remove reference to NAPI config option (score: 1): Author: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 17:22:32 -0800; e100 is NAPI all the time, so the Kconfig option is wasting space. Signed-off-by: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx> -- linux-2.6.11-rc2/drivers/net/Kconfig.orig 2005-01-31 17:10:44.900111944 -0800 ++; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02976.html (8,916 bytes)
9. Re: [PATCH 2.6] e100: remove reference to NAPI config option (score: 1): Author: Anton Blanchard <anton@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2005 12:43:58 +1100; Hi Scott, Speaking of NAPI... We have seen issues with NAPI on ppc64 on various cards in the past. Its possibly due to missing memory barriers; the interrupt and read of the interrupt status provide; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02978.html (8,244 bytes)
10. Re: [PATCH 2.6] e100: remove reference to NAPI config option (score: 1): Author: Scott Feldman <sfeldma@xxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 18:04:28 -0800; Anton, do you think this is the same issue Russel King is reporting against ARM? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=110686676829392&w=2 What happens in the ppc64 case? Do you have a fix f; /archives/netdev/2005-01/msg02979.html (8,260 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]