Results:
References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+2\/4\]\s+kill\s+struct\s+xfs_mount_args\s*$/: 24 ]
Total 24 documents matching your query.
- 1. Re: [PATCH 2/4] kill struct xfs_mount_args (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:35:35 +0200
- Can we please get these patches in? They've been out for almost _five_ month, and due to the nature of messing with the mount arguments they're going to cause conflict for anything dealing with mount
- /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00354.html (73,698 bytes)
- 2. sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rwsem.c:131 XFS? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 17) (score: 1)
- Author: x
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:18:29 +1100
- Ok looking at the whole series - [PATCH 1/4] don't leak m_fsname/m_rtname/m_logname Picked up by TAKE 981498 - don't leak m_fsname/m_rtname/m_logname http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00388.
- /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg00424.html (8,672 bytes)
- 3. use - was Re: [PATCH] prevent NULL returns from d_obtain_alias (score: 1)
- Author: Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:35:35 +0200
- Can we please get these patches in? They've been out for almost _five_ month, and due to the nature of messing with the mount arguments they're going to cause conflict for anything dealing with mount
- /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01175.html (73,519 bytes)
- 4. from invalid context at kernel/rwsem.c:131 XFS? (was: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 17) (score: 1)
- Author: MON@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:18:29 +1100
- Ok looking at the whole series - [PATCH 1/4] don't leak m_fsname/m_rtname/m_logname Picked up by TAKE 981498 - don't leak m_fsname/m_rtname/m_logname http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00388.
- /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01245.html (8,493 bytes)
- 5. Re: [PATCH 2/4] kill struct xfs_mount_args (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:17:35 +0200
- --end quoted text--
- /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00426.html (68,789 bytes)
- 6. Re: [PATCH 2/4] kill struct xfs_mount_args (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:17:35 +0200
- --end quoted text--
- /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg00874.html (68,789 bytes)
- 7. Re: [PATCH 2/4] kill struct xfs_mount_args (score: 1)
- Author:
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:05:05 +0200
- --end quoted text--
- /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00395.html (64,790 bytes)
- 8. Re: [PATCH 2/4] kill struct xfs_mount_args (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:05:42 +1000
- Overall is good - cleans up a lot of mess, but a couple of things need fixing: It's a double ptr that dup'd the mtpt= value to successfully. we check we have a string, but it still count be a null st
- /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00459.html (10,301 bytes)
- 9. Re: [PATCH 2/4] kill struct xfs_mount_args (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:53:27 +0200
- I've updated the patch to do the same check as the original code. I think the deviced name allocatiosn comment covers it. And I don't want to comment this too broadly as it's stuff that shouldn't eve
- /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00476.html (54,820 bytes)
- 10. Re: [PATCH 2/4] kill struct xfs_mount_args (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:12:21 +1000
- Yeah, looks good now. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00478.html (8,105 bytes)
- 11. Re: [PATCH 2/4] kill struct xfs_mount_args (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:05:05 +0200
- --end quoted text--
- /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01018.html (64,790 bytes)
- 12. Re: [PATCH 2/4] kill struct xfs_mount_args (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:05:42 +1000
- Overall is good - cleans up a lot of mess, but a couple of things need fixing: It's a double ptr that dup'd the mtpt= value to successfully. we check we have a string, but it still count be a null st
- /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01082.html (10,301 bytes)
- 13. Re: [PATCH 2/4] kill struct xfs_mount_args (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 21:53:27 +0200
- I've updated the patch to do the same check as the original code. I think the deviced name allocatiosn comment covers it. And I don't want to comment this too broadly as it's stuff that shouldn't eve
- /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01099.html (54,820 bytes)
- 14. Re: [PATCH 2/4] kill struct xfs_mount_args (score: 1)
- Author: <hch@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:12:21 +1000
- Yeah, looks good now. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01101.html (8,105 bytes)
- 15. ze option (score: 1)
- Author: >
- Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 21:07:41 +0200
- No need to parse the mount option into a structure before applying it to struct xfs_mount. The content of xfs_start_flags gets merged into xfs_parseargs. Calls inbetween don't care and can use mount
- /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00381.html (52,193 bytes)
- 16. option (score: 1)
- Author: xx>
- Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 21:07:41 +0200
- ize as mentioned in the com
- /archives/xfs/2008-05/msg00865.html (52,193 bytes)
- 17. Re: [PATCH 2/4] kill struct xfs_mount_args (score: 1)
- Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2008 14:35:35 +0200
- Can we please get these patches in? They've been out for almost _five_ month, and due to the nature of messing with the mount arguments they're going to cause conflict for anything dealing with mount
- /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg01993.html (73,750 bytes)
- 18. Re: [PATCH 2/4] kill struct xfs_mount_args (score: 1)
- Author: Donald Douwsma <donaldd@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 17:18:29 +1100
- Ok looking at the whole series - [PATCH 1/4] don't leak m_fsname/m_rtname/m_logname Picked up by TAKE 981498 - don't leak m_fsname/m_rtname/m_logname http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2008-07/msg00388.
- /archives/xfs/2008-10/msg02063.html (8,786 bytes)
- 19. Re: [PATCH 2/4] kill struct xfs_mount_args (score: 1)
- Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 01:17:35 +0200
- ping^2? --end quoted text--
- /archives/xfs/2008-08/msg01322.html (68,961 bytes)
- 20. Re: [PATCH 2/4] kill struct xfs_mount_args (score: 1)
- Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:05:05 +0200
- ping? --end quoted text--
- /archives/xfs/2008-07/msg01641.html (64,906 bytes)
Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]
This search system is powered by
Namazu