Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+2\/2\]\s+xfs\:\s+enhance\s+warning\s+on\s+xfs_imap\s+failure\s+in\s+xfs_iunlink

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+2\/2\]\s+xfs\:\s+enhance\s+warning\s+on\s+xfs_imap\s+failure\s+in\s+xfs_iunlink_remove\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 2/2] xfs: enhance warning on xfs_imap() failure in xfs_iunlink_remove() (score: 1): Author: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 11:41:30 -0400; Signed-off-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@xxxxxxxxxx> -- fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c | 6 ++++-- 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c index c22f980..; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00569.html (8,474 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: enhance warning on xfs_imap() failure in xfs_iunlink_remove() (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:25:32 +1000; The fact the format string is now split across 2 lines makes it hard to grep for. The indentation should be a clue that the warning code is intentionally formatted that way so that long format string; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00592.html (10,284 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]