Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+00\/22\]\s+xfs\:\s+metadata\s+CRCs\,\s+fourth\s+version\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\s+00\/22\]\s+xfs\:\s+metadata\s+CRCs\,\s+fourth\s+version\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH 00/22] xfs: metadata CRCs, fourth version (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:11:10 +1100; Hi Folks, New CRC patchset. Previous versions: http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-01/msg00328.html http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-02/msg00451.html http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-03/msg0; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00036.html (10,001 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH 00/22] xfs: metadata CRCs, fourth version (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2013 17:55:56 +1100; So in finishing this off this afternoon, I realised that there is another aspect of inode modifications that isn't fully covered by the CRCs - the unlinked list modifications. That is because it happ; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00099.html (12,313 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH 00/22] xfs: metadata CRCs, fourth version (score: 1): Author: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 15:42:58 -0500; Hi Dave, I've pulled in this series. There are still a few outstanding questions from review. I'm confident that we can get them sorted in the coming week. Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> Cheers; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00623.html (11,824 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH 00/22] xfs: metadata CRCs, fourth version (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:25:43 +1000; Fantastic, Ben. Thank you for all your time reviewing it. I'll send fixes for your outstanding review comments as incremental patches on top of the current tree now... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner d; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00627.html (12,461 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]