Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+xfs\:\s+Don\'t\s+keep\s+silent\s+if\s+sunit\/swidth\s+can\s+not\s+be\s+changed\s+via\s+mount\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+xfs\:\s+Don\'t\s+keep\s+silent\s+if\s+sunit\/swidth\s+can\s+not\s+be\s+changed\s+via\s+mount\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] xfs: Don't keep silent if sunit/swidth can not be changed via mount (score: 1): Author: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 19:44:18 +0800; As per the mount man page, sunit and swidth can be changed via mount options. For XFS, on the face of it, those options seems works if the specified alignments is properly, e.g. /dev/sdb1 on /mnt typ; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00632.html (9,971 bytes)
2. Re: [PATCH] xfs: Don't keep silent if sunit/swidth can not be changed via mount (score: 1): Author: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:51:18 -0500; As per the mount man page, sunit and swidth can be changed via mount options. For XFS, on the face of it, those options seems works if the specified alignments is properly, e.g. /dev/sdb1 on /mnt typ; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00634.html (11,241 bytes)
3. Re: [PATCH] xfs: Don't keep silent if sunit/swidth can not be changed via mount (score: 1): Author: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:11:36 +0800; Do you means that the string would shown as: "superblock does not support data alignment"? Or "cannot change alignment: superblock does not support data alignment"? I prefer to the later format becau; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00642.html (12,583 bytes)
4. Re: [PATCH] xfs: Don't keep silent if sunit/swidth can not be changed via mount (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:36:59 +1000; Can someone tell me why the XFS_MOUNT_RETERR flag exists? It looks like dead code to me as the only time mp->m_dalign is set prior to calling xfs_update_alignment() is the same code that sets XFS_MOU; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00646.html (12,189 bytes)
5. Re: [PATCH] xfs: Don't keep silent if sunit/swidth can not be changed via mount (score: 1): Author: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:54:58 +0800; This is really a very opportune response because I also worked out another tiny patch for removing XFS_MOUNT_RETERR a few minutes ago, just hesitating if I missed anything or not. Yes, I realized tha; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00650.html (13,172 bytes)
6. Re: [PATCH] xfs: Don't keep silent if sunit/swidth can not be changed via mount (score: 1): Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:35:14 +1000; Excellent - you're one step ahead of me :) I'll have a look when it appears on the list ;) Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; /archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00651.html (11,576 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]