Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+page_buf\s+stuff\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

1. xfs_syncsub() question (score: 1): Author: atter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 02:30:44 -0500; I'm deleting has a lot of extents but I also know that other filesystems are faster deleting files. Yes, I can understand that XFS must to "delete" some blocks that contain; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00677.html (8,755 bytes)
2. page_buf stuff (score: 1): Author: illa-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: 29 Oct 2002 07:43:33 -0600; /fs/xfs/pagebuf/page_buf.c.orig Tue Oct 29 01:48:57 2002 +++ linux/fs/xfs/pagebuf/page_buf.c Tue Oct 29 01:52:17 2002 @@ -1665,22 +1665,18 @@ bh = bufferlist[i]; /* Complete; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00680.html (11,287 bytes)
3. esults of my last question... (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:43:35 -0500; le ext2 needs to free this block and place it in the bitmaps. For xfs the same is true, it needs to free each extent. One of the issues with a journalled filesystem is we nee; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00699.html (15,544 bytes)
4. .. (score: 1): Author: ov <luben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 00:56:32 +0000; û?Í?±?±?Ö (?K?¸?{?¶?É? ?È?½?Ì???[???A?h???X?Ì?Ý?ð???«?º?³?¢?j zbn30628@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ???[???A?h???X?ð?²?L?ü?µ?Ä??¾?³?¢?B ?§104-0061 ?????s?????æ?â?À8-19-3 ?æ2?E?C???O?r???; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00700.html (10,765 bytes)
5. fsx corruption. (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 01:37:35 -0500; ion, and IMHO not a very good idea. If your expression is long enough that you'd need it you should be using explicit if-statements anyway. The 2.4 MD code isn't exactly a g; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00703.html (13,171 bytes)
6. PATCH] page_buf stuff (score: 1): Author: xxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:52:10 +0000; the error path when dealing with external devices (log/realtime). path_init was missing the LOOKUP_POSITIVE flag, so it would fail to tell us if the file doesn't exist; ther; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00705.html (12,996 bytes)
7. kernel update (score: 1): Author: <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:15:05 -0500; ld probably be rpmbuild --rebuild --target i686 kernel-foo.src.rpm -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs sandeen@xxxxxxx SGI, Inc. 651-683-3102; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00737.html (11,317 bytes)
8. about kernel update (score: 1): Author: ov <luben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 30 Oct 2002 17:35:48 -0600; vestigial variables etc in the quota code, left over from the VFS_RDONLY toggling that was going on there. Remove a couple other readonly device change remnants The followin; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00738.html (9,255 bytes)
9. Remove a couple other readonly device change remnants (score: 1): Author: <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:53:34 -0500; as a complete set of files including all deleted files. Which means it is now possible to check out a tree from any point in time. i.e. cvs -q update -D2001/01/01 -d It is a; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00739.html (10,150 bytes)
10. Can anyone give me some diagnosis? (score: 1): Author: Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 22:56:27 -0600 (CST); have linux-2.4.19 with xfs-1.2pre2 running on sparc (sun4m). I've found a problem about mkfx.xfs included in xfsprogs-2.3.5. If harddisk has only one partition, mkfx.xfs destoroy its disklabel. Hi; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00745.html (13,166 bytes)
11. bel (score: 1): Author: ndeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 01:30:55 -0500; a filesystem/disk label signature was detected). I'd be interested to hear whether this correctly detects the Sun label with; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00748.html (13,744 bytes)
12. s_trans.c (score: 1): Author: x>; Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 02:30:44 -0500; http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/linux-2.4-xfs/linux/fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c.diff?r1=1.279&r2=1.280 I don't know either what your rationale for this was, but it seems we n; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01456.html (8,755 bytes)
13. xfs_syncsub() question (score: 1): Author: -daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: 29 Oct 2002 07:43:33 -0600; f extents but I also know that other filesystems are faster deleting files. Yes, I can understand that XFS must to "delete" some blocks that contain; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01459.html (11,287 bytes)
14. questions (score: 1): Author: usell Cattelan <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 19:43:35 -0500; e.engr.sgi.com:/isms/slinx/2.4.x-xfs Modid: 2.4.x-xfs:slinx:131386a linux/fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c - 1.395 - remove getting the linux inode from xfs_vget; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01478.html (15,544 bytes)
15. xfs partition to mount (score: 1): Author: xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 00:56:32 +0000; gether in one host and the worth results came from mlDonkey downloader (eDonkey, napster, etc.. client). You can download it from http://www.freesof; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01479.html (10,765 bytes)
16. - more dead code removal (score: 1): Author:; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 01:37:35 -0500; ½?Ì???[???A?h???X?Ì?Ý?ð???«?º?³?¢?j zbn30628@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ???[???A?h???X?ð?²?L?ü?µ?Ä??¾?³?¢?B ?§104-0061 ?????s?????æ?â?À8-19-3 ?æ2?E?C???O?r???; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01482.html (13,171 bytes)
17. of my last question... (score: 1): Author: en Tuikov <luben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 11:52:10 +0000; itten out, the dirty bit should be turned on. This makes sense anywhich way you look at it and think about it. This makes sense from 1. the code I'v; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01484.html (12,996 bytes)
18. only-mount handling (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:15:05 -0500; never done this on a RedHat system. What I am looking for is some information on how to do this. Juri Haberland wrote: Joe St.Clair wrote: I asked a couple; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01516.html (11,317 bytes)
19. Be more careful about quota state changes on ro-devices (score: 1): Author: @xxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 30 Oct 2002 17:35:48 -0600; ernel-foo.src.rpm, and then as root* do: rpmbuild --ba --target i686 kernel-foo.src.rpm and a few hours later, you should have shiny new RPMs in /usr/src/re; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01517.html (9,255 bytes)
20. state changes on ro-devices (score: 1): Author: xxxxxx>; Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 18:53:34 -0500; install the SRPMs and run 'rpm -bb /usr/src/redhat/SPECS/$sspecfile' where $specfile different from SRPM to SRPM. After the compilation you find the RPMs i; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01518.html (10,150 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]