Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[PATCH\]\s+Implement\s+immutable\/append\-only\s+flags\s+in\s+XFS\s+\#5\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [PATCH] Implement immutable/append-only flags in XFS #5 (score: 1)
Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 21:02:03 -0800
[fifth revision: only changes is to update to current 2.4.21 CVS] Over time there has been many requests for ext2 file flags such as immutable, append-only, sync, noatime be implemented in XFS. So,
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00170.html (13,962 bytes)

2. Re: [PATCH] Implement immutable/append-only flags in XFS #5 (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 10:12:34 +1000
Any luck getting your VFS patch accepted Ethan? cheers. -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00174.html (7,955 bytes)

3. Re: [PATCH] Implement immutable/append-only flags in XFS #5 (score: 1)
Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 04:23:40 -0800
no, it was ignored. Eric suggested i should send it to fsdevel instead, ill do that whenever i get around to it. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ Attachment: pgpXGwxbOrMRH.pgp Descrip
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00175.html (9,034 bytes)

4. Re: [PATCH] Implement immutable/append-only flags in XFS #5 (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 10:01:35 +1000
For a bug fix, I would instead create a 2.6-current patch and send it to Andrew Morton with a detailed description of the problem and your solution. Once it is in an acceptable form for 2.6, it becom
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00182.html (8,808 bytes)

5. [PATCH] Implement immutable/append-only flags in XFS #5 (score: 1)
Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2003 21:02:03 -0800
[fifth revision: only changes is to update to current 2.4.21 CVS] Over time there has been many requests for ext2 file flags such as immutable, append-only, sync, noatime be implemented in XFS. So,
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00522.html (13,962 bytes)

6. Re: [PATCH] Implement immutable/append-only flags in XFS #5 (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 10:12:34 +1000
Any luck getting your VFS patch accepted Ethan? cheers. -- Nathan
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00526.html (7,955 bytes)

7. Re: [PATCH] Implement immutable/append-only flags in XFS #5 (score: 1)
Author: Ethan Benson <erbenson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2003 04:23:40 -0800
no, it was ignored. Eric suggested i should send it to fsdevel instead, ill do that whenever i get around to it. -- Ethan Benson http://www.alaska.net/~erbenson/ Attachment: pgptvBfWPvC15.pgp Descrip
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00527.html (9,034 bytes)

8. Re: [PATCH] Implement immutable/append-only flags in XFS #5 (score: 1)
Author: Nathan Scott <nathans@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 10:01:35 +1000
For a bug fix, I would instead create a 2.6-current patch and send it to Andrew Morton with a detailed description of the problem and your solution. Once it is in an acceptable form for 2.6, it becom
/archives/xfs/2003-08/msg00534.html (8,808 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]


This search system is powered by Namazu