- 1. nalised filesystem, part II. (score: 1)
- Author: ndeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:07:41 -0800
- don't we sync the last xfs_inode in xfs_syncsub()? I am wondering if the condition check is wrong... (see below) -- Masano -- linux/fs/xfs/xfs_vfsops.c Thu Oct 24 07:46:17 200
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00648.html (7,798 bytes)
- 2. b() question (score: 1)
- Author: illa-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:19:51 -0800
- et_dentry to linvfs_set_inode_ops. in 2.5.44 XFS's kernel when dentry is not cached , if detnry is searched using find_export_dentry knfsd will do Oops. this probrem's is the
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00649.html (7,284 bytes)
- 3. s to mainstream kernel? (score: 1)
- Author: <cattelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:23:24 -0800
- s than 2 se
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00659.html (7,178 bytes)
- 4. results of my last question... (score: 1)
- Author: illa-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:22:06 -0800
- t in one go
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00660.html (7,106 bytes)
- 5. gebuf request (score: 1)
- Author: kei@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:07:41 -0800
- 4]: Well, since all the irrelevant matches of a primitive grep '".*^I\+.*"' # literal Tab there... were in xfsidbg.c, I just went over them inside vim a
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01427.html (7,798 bytes)
- 6. equest (score: 1)
- Author: n <sandeen@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:19:51 -0800
- ilesystem management. The first question is about the creation of sparse files. I want to learn more and more. Another question is related to the proces
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01428.html (7,284 bytes)
- 7. n of ACLs to mainstream kernel? (score: 1)
- Author: xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:23:24 -0800
- I'm doing some research, and was wondering if anyone can give me a quick-n-dirty summary of why ACLs took so long to be included by Linus. I believe it had to do with elevation of user
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01438.html (7,178 bytes)
- 8. fix kNFSD operation (score: 1)
- Author: ttelan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:22:06 -0800
- hisa TAKEI at NEC for reminding me of this again and submitting an alternative patch. This is a different version I used to test the refcache performance, it goes through VFS_VGET to av
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01439.html (7,106 bytes)
- 9. [Bug 186] xfs_force_shutdown using NFS (score: 1)
- Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:07:41 -0800
- http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186 c.pascoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added -- Summary|xfs_force_shutdown on a lvm |xfs_force_shutdown using NFS -- Additional Comments From
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02206.html (7,813 bytes)
- 10. [Bug 186] xfs_force_shutdown using NFS (score: 1)
- Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 23:19:51 -0800
- http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186 -- Additional Comments From c.pascoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2002-10-27 23:19 -- Of course, by this I mean that it is returning EIO in the place where it sets e
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02207.html (7,299 bytes)
- 11. [Bug 186] xfs_force_shutdown using NFS (score: 1)
- Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:23:24 -0800
- http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186 -- Additional Comments From sandeen@xxxxxxx 2002-10-28 08:23 -- Chris - unfortunately, due to the way we export to CVS, you can't retrieve files that h
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02217.html (7,193 bytes)
- 12. [Bug 186] xfs_force_shutdown using NFS (score: 1)
- Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 08:22:06 -0800
- http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186 -- Additional Comments From sandeen@xxxxxxx 2002-10-28 08:22 -- Hi Chris - if you can decode the oops you got after you set the panic mask, that would
- /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02218.html (7,121 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu