Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bug\s+184\]\s+xfs_force_shutdown\s+called\s+on\s+lvm\-snapshot\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Bug\s+184\]\s+xfs_force_shutdown\s+called\s+on\s+lvm\-snapshot\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [Bug 184] xfs_force_shutdown called on lvm-snapshot (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 19:45:02 -0700; other day, not to us - it is not an XFS bug, but is rather a bug in the mount(2) program (part of the util-linux pa; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00426.html (7,934 bytes)
2. [Bug 184] xfs_force_shutdown called on lvm-snapshot (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 02:35:23 -0700; nge means. BTW, the plain RH8.0 installer worked without any problems. -- Florin Andrei Writing a book on wireless security is like writing a; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00433.html (7,841 bytes)
3. re: [Bug 184] xfs_force_shutdown called on lvm-snapshot (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:07:55 -0400; then. Did you have any lvm partitions at one point? The installer might be discovering something it shouldn't and trying to deal with it. You; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00463.html (8,313 bytes)
4. [Bug 184] xfs_force_shutdown called on lvm-snapshot (score: 1): Author: >; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:17:27 -0700; lso used to build libxfs for user space. The kernel and user space have different scoping rules, the STATIC macro is required for coexistence; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00520.html (7,671 bytes)
5. [Bug 184] xfs_force_shutdown called on lvm-snapshot (score: 1): Author: x; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:20:36 -0700; nly been looking at the code for 2 days, but a number of things have caught my eye. First, we were getting BUG in unlock_page(), see xfs-bugz; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00521.html (8,519 bytes)
6. s-inside-strings cleanup (score: 1): Author: ndeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:30:36 -0700; one that Christ; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00634.html (7,737 bytes)
7. Bug 185] New: Mount by LABEL does not work on whole disks. (score: 1): Author: Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxx>; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 19:45:02 -0700; t install, upgrade, use grub) yet it crashed. I attached the crash dump. The system is a SG; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01205.html (7,934 bytes)
8. ew: Mount by LABEL does not work on whole disks. (score: 1): Author: eith Owens <kaos@xxxxxxx>; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 02:35:23 -0700; S though? Did I misunderstand? -- Austin Gonyou <austin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Coremetrics, Inc. Attachment: signature.asc Description: This is; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01212.html (7,841 bytes)
9. -17.8 (score: 1): Author: Steve Lord <lord@xxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:07:55 -0400; sure that's available on the ftp site today. -Eric -- Eric Sandeen XFS for Linux http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs san; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01242.html (8,313 bytes)
10. g while holding a lock in _pagebuf_free_bh()::page_buf.c (score: 1): Author: ikov <luben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:17:27 -0700; kernel for a number of functions (& hence is built with STATIC=). Please do not remove the use of STATIC here, there; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01299.html (7,671 bytes)
11. uf.c (score: 1): Author: gzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:20:36 -0700; up_sync() both wake up all non-exclusive sleepers and one exclusive sleeper. The NON _sync versions, OTOH, will call; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01300.html (8,519 bytes)
12. s_force_shutdown on a lvm device (score: 1): Author: emon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:30:36 -0700; s.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186 -- Additional Comments From c.pascoe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2002-10-26 17:07 -- Created an attachment (id=42) --> (http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?i; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01413.html (7,737 bytes)
13. [Bug 184] xfs_force_shutdown called on lvm-snapshot (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2002 19:45:02 -0700; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184 -- Additional Comments From sandeen@xxxxxxx 2002-10-18 19:45 -- Can you reproduce this problem in a simpler setup? i.e. without having to install an lv; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01984.html (7,949 bytes)
14. [Bug 184] xfs_force_shutdown called on lvm-snapshot (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 02:35:23 -0700; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184 -- Additional Comments From sgi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2002-10-19 02:35 -- What I did was like this: lvcreate -n root-snap -L 512m /dev/master/root-xfs lvcr; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01991.html (7,856 bytes)
15. re: [Bug 184] xfs_force_shutdown called on lvm-snapshot (score: 1): Author: Greg Freemyer <freemyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 15:07:55 -0400; SInce you are creating snapshots, I assume you mean like: lvcreate -s -n root-snap -L 512m /dev/master/root-xfs lvcreate -s -n var-snap -L 512m /dev/master/var-xfs lvcreate -s -n home-snap -L 512m /; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02021.html (8,328 bytes)
16. [Bug 184] xfs_force_shutdown called on lvm-snapshot (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:17:27 -0700; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184 -- Additional Comments From sandeen@xxxxxxx 2002-10-22 21:17 -- Created an attachment (id=41) --> (http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41&act; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02078.html (7,701 bytes)
17. [Bug 184] xfs_force_shutdown called on lvm-snapshot (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 21:20:36 -0700; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184 -- Additional Comments From sandeen@xxxxxxx 2002-10-22 21:20 -- Ok, here's what's going on. Erik had some files with "left-over" preallocation on the f; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02079.html (8,534 bytes)
18. [Bug 184] xfs_force_shutdown called on lvm-snapshot (score: 1): Author: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxx; Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 19:30:36 -0700; http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184 sandeen@xxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added -- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED -- Additional Comments From sandeen@xxxxxxx 2002-10-26 19:30 -; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg02192.html (7,752 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]