Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BULK\]\s+Re\:\s+\[PATCH\]\s+xfstests\s+311\:\s+test\s+fsync\s+with\s+dm\s+flakey\s+V2\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [BULK] Re: [PATCH] xfstests 311: test fsync with dm flakey V2 (score: 1)
Author: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 20:24:04 -0400
Yeah I did the trap thing wrong it seems, I will fix that up and back out all of the related changes, thanks. I didn't change the test, I just had to change the golden output. I was running it agains
/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00586.html (24,121 bytes)

2. Re: [BULK] Re: [PATCH] xfstests 311: test fsync with dm flakey V2 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 11:08:29 +1000
..... `dmsetup suspend` ends up in dm_suspend(). This calls lock_fs(), which calls freeze_bdev().... If you do `dmsetup suspend --nolockfs` then it won't freeze the filesystem during the suspend... E
/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00587.html (13,272 bytes)

3. Re: [BULK] Re: [PATCH] xfstests 311: test fsync with dm flakey V2 (score: 1)
Author: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 21:32:37 -0400
Ok so I think I'll just make this test do all the iterations of the fsync tester with and without --nolockfs, since without --nolockfs I'm still seeing problems, does that sound reasonable? No kiddin
/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00589.html (15,307 bytes)

4. Re: [BULK] Re: [PATCH] xfstests 311: test fsync with dm flakey V2 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:12:14 +1000
Sounds like a fine plan to me ;) Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00590.html (13,332 bytes)

5. Re: [BULK] Re: [PATCH] xfstests 311: test fsync with dm flakey V2 (score: 1)
Author: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 15:31:01 -0400
Btw its test 19 O_DIRECT that gives me a 0 length file, the buffered case is fine. The test just does a randomly sized sub-block sized write over and over again for a random number of times and fsync
/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00612.html (15,366 bytes)

6. Re: [BULK] Re: [PATCH] xfstests 311: test fsync with dm flakey V2 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 08:05:22 +1000
Interesting - it only runs fsync every 8 iterations of the loop. Can you check that it is running enough loops to execute a fsync? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00616.html (11,223 bytes)

7. Re: [BULK] Re: [PATCH] xfstests 311: test fsync with dm flakey V2 (score: 1)
Author: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 18:32:14 -0400
If the loop doesn't fsync it still fsyncs before the program exits. Side note I once wasted a week because Chris's fsync tester _didn't_ fsync() before exit so it would tell you a md5sum of a file th
/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00617.html (12,517 bytes)

8. Re: [BULK] Re: [PATCH] xfstests 311: test fsync with dm flakey V2 (score: 1)
Author: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2013 08:49:37 +1000
Doh! I noticed that yesterday but forgot about it. Not enough coffee. I'll have a closer look, then. I think we've all made mistakes like that at least once.... :/ Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david
/archives/xfs/2013-04/msg00618.html (12,601 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu