Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BUG\s+183\]\s+here\s+is\s+the\s+patch\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[BUG\s+183\]\s+here\s+is\s+the\s+patch\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [BUG 183] here is the patch (score: 1): Author: >; Date: 17 Oct 2002 14:10:25 +0530; e util-linux/mount/mount_by_label.c::uuid_cache_init...) ... for(s = ptname; *s; s++); if (isdigit(s[-1])) { ...[do good stuff]... } and right; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg00385.html (6,926 bytes)
2. (fwd) (score: 1): Author: Centonza <matteo@xxxxxx>; Date: 17 Oct 2002 14:10:25 +0530; Are the warnings you see with or without the patch you added to the bug? Are the warnin; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01164.html (6,926 bytes)
3. [BUG 183] here is the patch (score: 1): Author: Ajay Ramaswamy <ajayr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; Date: 17 Oct 2002 14:10:25 +0530; Eric, 0. here is the patch the bugzilla one is wrapped and unusable 1. The warnings are there without the patch. 2. The warnings are there in other parts of the kernel too. Thanks & regards Ajay Atta; /archives/xfs/2002-10/msg01943.html (6,926 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]