| To: | Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [xfs-masters] Re: [PATCH 3/3] Assert notifier_block and notifier_call are not in init section |
| From: | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Apr 2006 13:38:22 -0700 (PDT) |
| Cc: | Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx>, akpm@xxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0604251624430.839-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org> |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0604251624430.839-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org> |
| Reply-to: | xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> What about loadable modules? Is their code never loaded into memory that
> used to be part of an init section?
Their code might _physically_ reside in a re-allocation of an init
section, but will have a virtual address far away (and it would be the
virtual address that you'd see if you took the address of a function).
Linus
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [xfs-masters] Re: [PATCH 3/3] Assert notifier_block and notifier_call are not in init section, Linus Torvalds |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [xfs-masters] Re: [PATCH 3/3] Assert notifier_block and notifier_call are not in init section, Randy.Dunlap |
| Previous by Thread: | [xfs-masters] Update Online Account, Royal Bank Of Canada |
| Next by Thread: | [xfs-masters] Re: [PATCH 3/3] Assert notifier_block and notifier_call are not in init section, Randy.Dunlap |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |