xfs-masters
[Top] [All Lists]

[xfs-masters] XFS and booting

To: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [xfs-masters] XFS and booting
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 20:59:01 -0700
Reply-to: xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070212)
I have been looking at adding XFS support to the syslinux bootloader 
suite, and discovered, to my dismay:

No, for root partition installations because the XFS superblock is 
written at block zero, where LILO would be installed. This is to 
maintain compatibility with the IRIX on-disk format, and will not be 
changed.

This means that it's impossible to write a boot loader that actually 
plays by the x86 platform rules and still can boot from XFS.  Other than 
the GRUB option of spreading itself all over the disk in places it 
shouldn't be, like the MBR, thus breaking e.g. softraid and creating all 
kinds of unnecessary interoperability problems.

Anyway, since it looks like the damage of not offsetting the filesystem 
has already been done, I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, can 
be done about it.  A standard MBR will never be able to boot an XFS, but 
perhaps a slightly modified MBR can be made to do that, without 
introducing filesystem-instance-specific issues.  In particular, if 
there is space anywhere in the superblock for a "boot sector pointer", 
*and* there is a way to safely write this pointer, then a slightly 
modified MBR could detect an XFS superblock and re-read a boot sector at 
that offset.

Is this something that could be done?

        -hpa


P.S. If this email sounds a bit irate, it is because I'm really dismayed 
at this.  XFS is a good filesystem, and people want to use it.  However, 
as it is, they're left between the choices of a /boot partition, or 
using GRUB-like hacks, and I fear they will choose the latter.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [xfs-masters] XFS and booting, H. Peter Anvin <=