| To: | David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [xfs-masters] Re: 2.6.18-rc6-mm2 |
| From: | Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:37:24 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VrMwdlEzZPHIexETEBRJw5lcXlRnlb6HZ3lqwWfwW6RL3lSZqnqRf+nGgW3yZ29cSip3X2iSJ80Khz44zeWGm8eB0wwljkrm2MjFtI0TKC9b/fDlzUxlVHicjlXwKjFWnsnqw9FQM0vnJ7Nq3I8cOvA0u6ZHjw1hsw0hTuupYr8= |
| In-reply-to: | <20060914035904.GF3034@melbourne.sgi.com> |
| References: | <20060912000618.a2e2afc0.akpm@osdl.org> <6bffcb0e0609120554j5e69e2sd2c8ebb914c4c9f5@mail.gmail.com> <6bffcb0e0609120842s6a38b326u4e1fff2e562a6832@mail.gmail.com> <20060912162555.d71af631.akpm@osdl.org> <6bffcb0e0609121634l7db1808cwa33601a6628ee7eb@mail.gmail.com> <20060912163749.27c1e0db.akpm@osdl.org> <20060913015850.GB3034@melbourne.sgi.com> <20060913042627.GE3024@melbourne.sgi.com> <6bffcb0e0609130243y776492c7g78f4d3902dc3c72c@mail.gmail.com> <20060914035904.GF3034@melbourne.sgi.com> |
| Reply-to: | xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| Sender: | xfs-masters-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060808) |
David Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:43:32AM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote: >> On 13/09/06, David Chinner <dgc@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>> I've booted 2.6.18-rc6-mm2 and mounted and unmounted several xfs >>> filesystems. I'm currently running xfsqa on it, and I haven't seen >>> any failures on unmount yet. >>> >>> That test case would be really handy, Michal. >> http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/files/mm/2.6.18-rc6-mm2/test_mount_fs.sh >> >> ls -hs /home/fs-farm/ >> total 3.6G >> 513M ext2.img 513M ext4.img 513M reiser3.img 513M xfs.img >> 513M ext3.img 513M jfs.img 513M reiser4.img > > Ok, so you're using loopback and mounting one of each filesystem, then > unmounting them in the same order. I have mounted and unmounted an > XFS filesystem in isolation in exactly the same way you have been, but > I haven't seen any failures. > > Can you rerun the test with just XFS in your script and see if you > see any failures? If you don't see any failures, can you add each > filesystem back in one at a time until you see failures again? I still get an oops (with xfs only). Maybe it's file system image problem. xfs_info /mnt/fs-farm/xfs/ meta-data=/dev/loop1 isize=256 agcount=8, agsize=16384 blks = sectsz=512 data = bsize=4096 blocks=131072, imaxpct=25 = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks, unwritten=1 naming =version 2 bsize=4096 log =internal bsize=4096 blocks=1200, version=1 = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks realtime =none extsz=65536 blocks=0, rtextents=0 > > Cheers, > > Dave. Regards, Michal -- Michal K. K. Piotrowski LTG - Linux Testers Group (http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/ltg/) |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [xfs-masters] Re: 2.6.18-rc6-mm2, Andrew Morton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [xfs-masters] Re: 2.6.18-rc6-mm2, David Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | [xfs-masters] Re: 2.6.18-rc6-mm2, Michal Piotrowski |
| Next by Thread: | [xfs-masters] Re: 2.6.18-rc6-mm2, Michal Piotrowski |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |